"Silicon Valley Is Quietly Building Its Own Wall Street"
From Marker at Medium:
Can a new stock exchange backed by the Bay Area’s most powerful players take on the NYSE and Nasdaq?
This story is part of The New Rules of the IPO, a multi-part special report. Illustrations: James Clapham
On a drizzly San Francisco day in December, Eric Ries is stationed inside the Succession-worthy
offices of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. Here, at the
billion-dollar law firm — whose clients include Oracle, Microsoft,
Intel, Cisco, Pinterest, and Stripe — guys dressed VC chic in V-neck
cashmere sweaters and soft loafers shush across carpeted floors. It’s a
frictionless world, all potential irritants engineered away. If you want
to be where it happens in Bay Area tech, this is a good place to start.
Ries,
in black glasses and a chinstrap beard, looks like a poli sci professor
who’s wandered in from Berkeley. The 41-year-old’s 2011 bestseller, The Lean Startup, introduced the masses to product/market fit, minimum viable product, and the pivot. It
also vaulted Ries into nerd celebrity status, a coach and mentor to
Silicon Valley’s elite. Between his speaking gigs — which now earn him
upwards of $40,000 a pop — book royalties, and consulting work for
companies like Procter & Gamble and GE, “Lean Startup Inc.” could
have allowed Ries to carry on in low-key rich mode indefinitely.
Instead, Ries is now focused on his most ambitious — and risky — venture
yet: a new stock exchange called the LTSE, or Long-term Stock Exchange.
Ries’s
words and time are now tightly guarded by a personal assistant and the
LTSE’s head of communications, Steve Goldstein, whose last job, as Rex
Tillerson’s Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public
Affairs, ended in dismissal via presidential tweet. (Ries, for the
record, was a prominent supporter of “Nerdz 4 Hillary,” a 2016
tech-world fundraiser for Hillary Clinton.) Today, Ries is at Orrick —
his LTSE cofounder, John Bautista, is a partner at the firm — for a full
day of closed-door meetings with CEOs and institutional investors,
talking up the LTSE.
The
LTSE is a controversial new exchange that, Ries argues, will create a
fundamental shift in the capital markets. Founders and CEOs will be able
to focus on long-term value creation, innovation pipelines, and
sustainability goals, while retaining tighter control over the destiny
of their companies. But to its critics, the LTSE is either an
unnecessary marketing exercise for a handful of Silicon Valley players,
or a ploy to let companies profit from public markets while avoiding the
accountability of market forces.
When
it launches — sometime late in the first quarter of this year, Ries
hopes — the LTSE will be the 14th U.S. exchange registered for trading
securities, but only the third active exchange that is approved for both
trading and listing of public companies. That means, instead of IPO’ing
on the NYSE or Nasdaq, companies will now have the option of listing
shares, aka “going public,” on the LTSE. Ries has been in roadshow mode
for the past year, but since May 2019, when the Securities and Exchange
Commission green-lit the LTSE’s application to operate a public
exchange, he’s shifted into high gear — pitching the LTSE at trending,
still-private companies, and hosting, so far, three of these daylong
“investor coalition” meetings in San Francisco.
The
LTSE has raised $70 million from a who’s who of Silicon Valley VCs:
Andreessen Horowitz; Collaborative Fund; Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund;
LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, now a partner at venture firm Greylock
Partners, along with AOL founder Steve Case.
Generally,
they run something like today’s event. The people in the room are a
combination of mostly private-company founders and public-market
investors “who are very long-term for whatever reason,” Ries says,
including a contingent of retirement-fund managers from flyover states
who don’t typically get to rub shoulders with Silicon Valley types. Ries
gives a five-minute “big themes” talk, which is followed by a workshop
covering some nuts-and-bolts aspects of becoming a publicly traded
company. “It may be the first time anyone’s talked to them about the
mechanics of how public markets work,” Ries says. The rest of the day is
devoted to one-on-one meetings between companies and investors — not
hard-sell LTSE meetings, says Ries, but information-sharing sessions,
with “both sides sharing things they want to know from each other. Our
mission is to bring these constituencies together and help them get more
aligned” — specifically, around the virtues of financial
“long-termism.”
Ries
has lined up powerful backers — friends, former coworkers, clients, and
investors that he has collected through his varied career. The LTSE has
raised $70 million from a who’s who of Silicon Valley VCs: Andreessen
Horowitz; Collaborative Fund; Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund; Initialized,
the firm run by Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian; and Obvious Ventures,
an early-stage VC firm co-founded by Ev Williams (founder and CEO of
Medium, which Obvious is also an investor in). LinkedIn co-founder Reid
Hoffman, now a partner at venture firm Greylock Partners, is also in,
along with AOL founder Steve Case. But Ries himself is the biggest
shareholder in the for-profit exchange; before the LTSE’s most recent
funding round, he held a 29% stake.
If
companies and investors buy into Ries’s big idea, that the public
markets are broken and a fundamental change is needed, there is a
giddying upside. Not just for Ries and his investors — running a
securities exchange can be a very lucrative business — but for every
striving startup founder and Main Street investor. But, as we’ve seen
before with other new stock markets, there’s also a very good chance the
whole thing could fizzle.
Ries
founded his first company, a career site for college students, while
studying computer science and philosophy at Yale. Part Facebook, part
LinkedIn — but too early — it failed. After arriving in Silicon Valley
in 2001, Ries worked as a software engineer at a virtual-world company
called There, and cofounded IMVU, an avatar-based 3D social network
(think, Second Life), in 2004. After raising about
$29M, he left the business in 2008 (he remains a shareholder.) Ries then
spent a short time at VC firm Kleiner Perkins before turning to
blogging and writing about his business-world experiences, which
provided the seeds for his book, The Lean Startup, which would go on to become a New York Times bestseller and the unofficial bible of Silicon Valley.
He
first proposed something like the LTSE in its final chapter, riffing on
it for less than a page. “I wanted to talk about the broader social
implications of the startup movement — what we as a movement should
aspire to beyond just making a quick buck by selling to big companies,”
he says. “One of the things was this idea about changing capital
markets.”
He
conceived of an exchange that would allow companies to benefit from the
sale of common stock, while insulating them from short-term
stock-market pressures, which he saw as destructive to corporate
innovation. “I never dreamed that I would have to be the one to do it,”
he says. But the idea stuck with him, reinforced by seeing the
challenges that many of his consulting clients were facing. “You name
any industry, from 10 employees to thousands — when a company has a bad
quarter, the first projects to be canceled are the innovation projects,
even though that’s irrational,” Ries says. “It doesn’t make the company
more efficient to eat the seed corn.”
In 2018, according to Harvard Law Review,
activist hedge funds deployed a record $65 billion across 250 campaigns
aimed at influencing business strategy, obtaining board seats, urging
or discouraging a sale or merger, and forcing so-called “balance-sheet
actions.”
Short-termism
has social consequences, too. Ries offers the “acid test” of a company
that finds out its product is harming customers or their community.
“It’s like the great moral quandary of capitalism,” Ries says. “Do you
bury the research because that will be profitable for the short-term, or
do you do the right thing? Most companies fail that test, in the name
of serving shareholders. But is it really serving shareholders to
destroy your company? And you should see what happens when the activist
campaigns show up.”
In 2018, according to Harvard Law Review,
activist hedge funds such as Elliott Management and Starboard Value
deployed a record $65 billion across 250 campaigns aimed at influencing
business strategy, obtaining board seats, urging or discouraging a sale
or merger, and forcing so-called “balance-sheet actions,” such as
returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share repurchases.
Target companies included Campbell Soup Company, United Technologies,
and Pernod Ricard....