"Homo Gluttonous"
From Aeon:
Humans have evolved with little resistance to abundant, easy food. Will we gorge ourselves and our planet to death?
Ten thousand desert rats, 10,000 fish, 14,000 sheep, 1,000 lambs,
1,000 fat oxen and many more creatures slaughtered, cooked and served:
that is how Ashurnishabal of Mesopotamia (883-859 BCE) pampered almost
70,000 guests for 10 days. The Archbishop of York’s enthronement feast
in 1466 CE required 104 oxen, 2,000 geese, 1,000 capons, 1,000 sheep,
400 swans, 12 porpoises and seals, and a great number of other birds and
mammals. In an appropriately grandiose sidebar to his ornate reign as
king of France, Louis XIV became incapacitated by overeating at one of
his own weddings.
Nothing pulls at the imagination like extremes –
overwrought banquets and orgies, epic battles, devastating natural
disasters, glorious human triumphs. Our omnivorous appetites find
extravagant feasts awe-inspiring and enviable, and occasionally
disconcerting.
During our hunter-gatherer past, which constitutes
99 per cent of our history as a species, those omnivorous tastes served
us well. We routinely dined to capacity on a wide variety of nutritious
fare to save us from malnutrition and starvation. (We also, quite
frequently, went without food for days or weeks at a time.) Food quality
and quantity were unpredictable, as contingent upon human forces such
as trade routes as upon the vagaries of weather and natural cycles. Very
early on, we adapted to periodic scarcity, leaping at any chance to
pile on calories and storable nutrients – for instance, when we found a
bush laden with ripe berries, or a rockpool full of tide-stranded
shellfish. Those who were quick-witted enough to see an opportunity when
it presented itself, and had the physiological means to convert extra
calories into fat, were more likely to survive long stretches between
meals, and to raise healthy offspring.
These adaptations had long
been in place when humankind began its first huge revolution, the
agricultural, which allowed food storage. As civilisations sprang up,
the main beneficiaries of stuffed grain bins and successful herding –
pharaohs, kings and other rulers – could stage banquets to repay
political favours, or use them as a sign of power over the have-not
majority. The fantastic feast became part of folklore, for the elite.
Alas,
socioeconomic inequality was a fact of life in Europe, Asia and many
other parts of the civilising world. ‘Food became a social
differentiation – a signifier of class, a measure of rank – at a remote,
undocumented moment when some people started to command more food
resources than others,’ explains the food historian Felipe
Fernández-Armesto of the University of Notre Dame in Indiana.
Some
of the first food-utopia stories emerged in medieval Europe, a time of
deeply entrenched religious belief and feudalism, as well as famine and
epidemics. Dreaming of a paradise of easy eating became a popular escape
for beleaguered peasants.
Versions of this ideal place include the German Schlaraffenland (‘lazy land’), the Dutch Luilekkerland
(‘lazy-luscious land’) and, most familiarly, the Land of Cockaigne,
which first appeared in 1250 as a poem in France. All three had in
common lavish quantities of food, plenty of leisure time, and an
implicit or explicit challenge to the class system.
The land of
idle overeating was as surreal as a painting by Hieronymus Bosch. Trees
were festooned with comestibles or houses were constructed from them.
Various farm animals, already cooked and occasionally stuck with
convenient knives and forks, sported about seemingly alive – a benign
variation of the undead. Eels and meat pies tumbled from the sky like
rain. Rivers ran with wine or milk. Everywhere were animals ready for
the eating, sometimes jumping right into the diner’s mouth. The
gruelling work of raising domesticated beasts and fowl, slaughtering and
cooking them, disappeared.
In his book Dreaming of Cockaigne
(2001), Herman Pleij, emeritus professor of medieval Dutch literature
at the University of Amsterdam, describes the period’s fear that an
‘already-wretched earthly existence would suddenly take a turn for the
worse’. To cut the anxiety, fantasy food-utopias spliced the daily fight
for survival with ‘the humour of hyperbole to produce hilarious
topsy-turvy worlds’. Cockaigne was a return to the Garden of Eden, a
terrestrial version of Heaven, perfecting upon Nature, eliminating pain,
discomfort and want of any kind. In that magical land, the human
struggle within the food chain was finally over, and we were free – not
only of being prey, but also of being fully predatory too. It also
removed the backbreaking and miserable labour involved in farming for
the benefit of overlords.
The willingness of animals to be food in
Cockaigne echoes some Native American stories in which prey such as
deer or rabbits offer themselves to hunters who treat them well. For
Native Americans, the idea of a mutually respectful arrangement could be
called enlightened self-interest; a sustainable hunt would ensure a
future for subsequent generations of both the animals and the hunters
who want to eat them. By contrast, the mostly domesticated animals in
the land of Cockaigne are willing no matter how the diners behave. As in
any fantasy, natural laws do not apply.
One constant seems clear: Gluttony –
shameful or proud – persists as exuberant overeating at social
gatherings, eating contests, and shopping sprees at price-club
MegaMarts. But by any other name it is still a reminder of the polarised
privilege inherent in agrarianism and our more precarious past.
Pleij
contends that, if the people of medieval times could see us now,
‘Modern-day Europe [would represent] in many respects the realisation of
Cockaigne: fast food is available at all hours, as are climatic
control, free sex, unemployment benefits, and plastic surgery that
seemingly prolongs youth.’ Without having to be all that historically
savvy, today’s marketers can exploit consumer lust based on human nature
alone. In fact, it might be one of the easiest ways to get consumers to
part with their money: boggle their minds with food worthy of a feast,
making it easy to acquire and consume....
....
MUCH MORE