Wednesday, November 6, 2013

UPDATED--The Financial Panic of 33

Update: Oh crap.
I have been reminded that in December 2012 FT Alphaville posted "What have the Romans ever done for us?" which explains why, despite not being a classicist, the story of Tiberius seemed familiar.
I may have forgotten that but I remember that dementia is derived from the Latin de mens, roughly "away mind".
Update II: Double crap.
I am now told there was an even earlier Alphaville ref, 2010's "I, Jean-Claudius"

Original post:
That's 33 A.D. (or CE, whatev)
From Global Financial Data:

Was the Financial Crisis of 33 AD the First Case of Quantitative Easing?
Although many people have hailed Ben Bernanke’s response to the current financial crisis for going outside of the box and using unorthodox policies to avoid a financial collapse, in reality, similar policies were used by Tiberius during the Financial Crisis of 33 AD, almost 2000 years ago.

Tiberius ruled the Roman Empire from 14 AD to 37 AD.  He was frugal in his expenditures, and consequently, he never raised taxes during his reign. When Cappadocia became a province, Tiberius was even able to lower Roman taxes.  His frugality also allowed him to be liberal in helping the provinces when, for example, a massive earthquake destroyed many of the famous cities of Asia, or when a financial panic struck the Roman Empire in 33 AD.

As with many financial panics, this one began when unexpected events in one part of the Roman world spread to the rest of the Empire. To quote Otto Lightner from his History of Business Depressions, “The important firm of Seuthes and Son, of Alexandria, was facing difficulties because of the loss of three richly laden ships in a Red Sea storm, followed by a fall in the value of ostrich feather and ivory. About the same time the great house of Malchus and Co. of Tyre with branches at Antioch and Ephesus, suddenly became bankrupt as a result of a strike among their Phoenician workmen and the embezzlements of a freedman manager. These failures affected the Roman banking house, Quintus Maximus and Lucious Vibo. A run commenced on their bank and spread to other banking houses that were said to be involved, particularly Brothers Pittius.

“The Via Sacra was the Wall Street of Rome and this thoroughfare was teeming with excited merchants. These two firms looked to other bankers for aid, as is done today. Unfortunately, rebellion had occurred among the semi civilized people of North Gaul, where a great deal of Roman capital had been invested, and a moratorium had been declared by the governments on account of the distributed conditions. Other bankers, fearing the suspended conditions, refused to aid the first two houses and this augmented the crisis.”

At the same time, agriculture had been on the decline for several years, and Tiberius required that one-third of every senator’s fortune be invested in Italian land.  The senators had 18 months to make this adjustment, but by the time the period was up, many senators had failed to make the proper adjustment.  This deadline occurred at the same time as the events above occurred, placing a further squeeze on the financial sector.
When Publius Spencer, a wealthy noblemen, requested 30 million sesterces from his banker Balbus Ollius, the firm was unable to fulfill his request and closed its doors.  Over the next few days, prominent banks in Corinth, Carthage, Lyons and Byzantium announced they had to “rearrange their accounts,” i.e. they had failed. This led to a bank panic and the closure of several banks along the Via Sacra in Rome.  The confluence of these seemingly unrelated events led to a financial panic....MORE
 HT: Business Insider

Readers may recognize Global Financial Data from their day job-putting together ridiculously long price series:
Oooh Ooooh: British Sovereign Yields to 1742--Chart
"Ja, ja, So Your U.S. Market is Up a Bit, Ever Hear of Berlin, 1923?"
Chartology: 500 Years of Energy Costs