Friday, July 2, 2010

"Buffett's Berkshire Off the Hook for Derivatives Collateral: Lawmakers" (BRK.A; BRK.B)

Now that's power.
On Wednesday we posted "Berkshire May Be Required To Post Up To $8 Billion In Collateral" (BRK.A; BRK.B)" which took a look at the as-written "reform" bill's impact on Berkshire Hathaway's derivative positions with a focus on the index puts.
[and quite a discourse on put pricing, Zvi Bodie and infighting in the Academy -ed]

Here's the upshot of all the political gaming, from CNBC:
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, along with other companies in similar circumstances, won't have to put up any collateral for existing derivatives contracts, according to a letter written by two of the key FinReg lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
Democratic Senators Chris Dodd (Connecticut) and Blanche Lincoln (Arkansas) told House Democrats that the version of the bill now moving forward on Capitol Hill "provides legal certainty to those contracts currently in existence, providing that no contract could be terminated, renegotiated, modified, amended, or supplemented."
Dodd and Lincoln also write, "It is imperative that we provide certainty to those existing contracts for the sake of our economy and financial system."
The first report on the letter came from Erik Holm of Dow Jones Newswires, who was given a copy by Berkshire when he asked for comment on an analyst's forecast this week that the company might have to put up between $6 and $8 billion in collateral due to the new FinReg bill before Congress.
Buffett and other Berkshire executives had argued that while they have no objection to requiring collateral on future derivatives contracts, they shouldn't be forced to absorb the extra cost of posting collateral on existing contracts.