Showing posts sorted by date for query lynas. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query lynas. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, October 1, 2026

"Lynas Rare Earths (ASX:LYC) A$968m [$672 million USD] Deal Doubles Down on the Heavy Rare Earths Race"

The acquirer's stock got walloped on the news of the price paid but the HREE focus is where LYC has a strategic advantage over the American standard-bearer MP Materials.

From Stocks Down Under, October 1:

Investment Case Summary

  • Caldeira adds the largest ionic clay rare earth resource outside China and lifts Lynas reserves by 26%.
  • The all-scrip structure preserves Lynas A$1.2 billion cash to fund the US$500m-plus Brazil build.
  • Brazilian regulatory approval under new critical minerals law is the key execution risk before March 2027. 

The deal doubles the resource base. The real question is whether Brazil approvals arrive on time.

Lynas Rare Earths (ASX:LYC) has agreed to acquire Meteoric Resources in an all-scrip scheme valued at A$968 million on a fully diluted basis. The deal hands Lynas the Caldeira Project in Minas Gerais, Brazil, the largest known ionic clay rare earth oxide resource outside China under the JORC Code.

The exchange ratio of 0.0207 Lynas shares per Meteoric share implies A$0.286 per Meteoric share, a 68.4% premium to the last close of A$0.17. Meteoric shareholders will end up owning roughly 5.9% of the combined group on a fully diluted basis.

The strategic logic is clear enough. Caldeira adds an estimated 802kt of NdPr oxides and 41kt of DyTb oxides to Lynas, lifts Measured and Indicated TREO resources by about 79% and Ore Reserves by 26% on a pro forma basis. It also diversifies Lynas from one tier-one orebody to two, pairing the hard rock Mt Weld deposit in Western Australia with a scalable ionic clay asset in a supportive mining jurisdiction.

Why is Lynas paying up for Caldeira now?

Because scale and heavy rare earths are suddenly the whole game. Caldeira contains both light and heavy rare earth elements, with life-of-mine production of around 3,862 tonnes of NdPr and 127 tonnes of DyTb a year under Meteoric’s definitive feasibility study.

DyTb is the strategic prize. Dysprosium and terbium are the heavy rare earths that go into high-performance magnets for EVs, wind turbines and defence electronics, and China still controls almost all commercial supply. A credible non-Chinese source of DyTb is scarce, and Caldeira is one of the few outside China that has moved through a DFS....

....MUCH MORE 

LYC was down 8.6% (-A$1.19) to A$12.64 on Thursday and year-to-date is up a measly 1.8%:

 

TradingView 

On the Heavy Rare Earth Elements, a couple mentions in the last year (we have dozens on LYC and MP going back to the 2009 - 2011 glory days): 

January 2026 - Rare Earths: "Australia's Lynas reports Q2 revenue surge on higher prices" (LYC.ax)

Our preference among the Western mines due to the heavy rare earth resource/reserves.

October 2025 - Why Did President Zelensky Come Away From His Meeting Without Tomahawk Missiles? Think Rare Earths

There are, of course, a few reasons that President Trump is reluctant to send the missiles to NATO partners for resale to Ukraine, the most commonly uttered example is a determination to not expand and extend the war.

However, there are a couple rare earth angles that are also behind the decision....

***

....One way for China to keep Russia in the fight is to pressure the U.S. generally on the critical minerals.

Another is to focus on the Tomahawks themselves. They cannot be built without the use of dysprosium magnets in the actuators that move the control fins.

Dysprosium is a Heavy Rare Earth Element (HREE) and America's only rare earth mine at Mountain Pass doesn't produce it. Australia's Lynas produces some but unlike the light rare earths, the HREEs are pretty much all found in Chinese geologies.

If interested see last week's reposted article from 2012 "The only five rare earth elements that matter": 

[Jack Lifton writing]....I follow four or five critical REEs that each have individual markets. One of them is neodymium, because it’s the most important REE used in permanent magnets. The others are heavy rare earth elements (HREEs), including europium, terbium, dysprosium and yttrium. The latter isn’t really an REE, but it’s associated with them. As the market corrects to reasonable prices, people are coming to understand this.... 

Neodymium magnets are not as robust as those made from dysprosium and are more likely to fail under thermal and physical stress, leaving you with an unguided missile flying hither and yon.

As things stand right now, China not only has one heck of a monopoly on the majority of the rare earth supply chains, from mine to fabrication but absolutely controls the one for the absurdly critical input into Tomahawk missiles.

Oh, and after lobbing a bunch of the Tomahawks at the Houthis in Yemen, we see this at ZeroHedge October 14: "Military Analyst Warns US Doesn't Have Enough Tomahawks To Send To Ukraine".

All because China found and exploited a point of maximum pressure to implement their geostrategic worldview.

*** 

MP has the backing of the U.S. Government while Australia's richest person, Gina Rinehart owns 8.2% of LYC, formerly worth around a billion U.S.

Fun fact:

Critical Minerals: "Mining tycoon Gina Rinehart buys over $1 billion SpaceX stake" (SPCX)

She also owns 8.4% of MP. 

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Critical Minerals: "Mining tycoon Gina Rinehart buys over $1 billion SpaceX stake" (SPCX)

From the Wall Street Journal via MSN, June 15: 

Gina Rinehart, Australia’s richest person, has bought a more-than $1 billion stake in SpaceX, betting on founder Elon Musk and what she says is the potential for his rocket maker to shape industries for decades.

The stake in SpaceX, which last week pulled off the largest initial public offering ever, is the single largest investment outside of iron ore made by her closely held company, Hancock Prospecting, one of the world’s major exporters of the steelmaking commodity.

The investment reflects Hancock’s confidence in Musk and recognizes the need for the West to keep investing in technology and innovation, Rinehart said in emailed remarks on Monday.

“We see SpaceX as a rare business: led by a truly exceptional person, technically exceptional and operating in sectors that are crucial, and with long-term potential,” she said. Rinehart didn’t specify the value of the investment but a person familiar with the investment said it was valued in excess of $1 billion....

....MUCH MORE 

If there is any moon-mining to be done she'll be there and if SpaceX has need for rare earths her stakes in Lynas and MP may offer an edge on the procurement front. 

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

"GE Vernova and Vertiv Report Wednesday: The Real AI Data-Center Trade" (GEV; VRT)

We last visited TECHi March 28, to look at "BlackRock’s Larry Fink: AI Is Not a Bubble — Power Is the Real Bottleneck". GEV hit a new all-time-high yesterday, $1,009.89, before reversing and closing down. $995.90 last up$ 3.33 (+0.34%) in pre-market trade.

From TECHi, April 20 (our interest is the GE Vernova commentary):

Two stocks report earnings Wednesday morning, and between them they tell you more about the real economics of the AI build-out than Tesla’s robotaxi slides or Alphabet’s capex footnote ever will. GE Vernova (GEV) closed Friday at $1,002.75, up roughly 200% in a year. Vertiv (VRT) closed at $307.34, up about 42% year-to-date on a $15 billion backlog. Both are “pick-and-shovel” names, not AI labs, and both sit directly in the path of the capital that hyperscalers have already committed to spend. The question Wednesday answers is whether the numbers behind that spend are hitting the tape, or only the press release. 

Key Takeaways

  • Same Morning, Same Thesis: GE Vernova (GEV) and Vertiv (VRT) both report Q1 2026 earnings before the bell on Wednesday, April 22, 2026 — GEV at 7:30 AM ET, VRT at 11:00 AM ET.
  • Live Tape: GEV closed Friday at $1,002.75 (up ~200% in a year). VRT closed at $307.34 (up ~42% YTD) on a reported $15B backlog.
  • The Capex Anchor: Wall Street consensus now pegs 2026 hyperscaler capex at $527 billion. Goldman flags that consensus has been too low for two straight years — actual growth exceeded 50% against implied 20%.
  • Vertiv Q1 Guide: Net sales $2.5–$2.7B, adjusted EPS $0.95–$1.01. Printing to the high end with a full-year raise is the clean bull signal.
  • The Pair-Trade Logic: Every AI megawatt added to hyperscaler capacity generates orders at both names — GEV supplies the electrons, VRT manages the heat. A 60/40 GEV/VRT blend captures most of the cycle upside....
*****

....Why Wednesday Matters More Than Tuesday’s Tesla Print 
GE Vernova reports Q1 2026 results before the open on Wednesday, April 22, with a 7:30 AM ET webcast from CEO Scott Strazik and CFO Ken Parks. Vertiv reports the same morning, with an 11:00 AM ET call. Having both names on the same tape is a gift for anyone trying to separate AI capex narrative from AI capex cash.

Tesla on Wednesday will drive the headlines because robotaxi is louder than gas turbines and liquid cooling. But the signal investors actually need lives in the GEV and VRT prints. If orders are accelerating, backlogs are extending, and gross margins are holding, the AI infrastructure cycle has another 12 to 18 months of visibility that the sell-side still has not fully modeled. If any of those three slip, the whole “AI capex is different this time” thesis takes a hit....

....MUCH MORE 

Another name in the hyper-concentrated electrical mini-portfolio, Quanta Services, is due to release earnings next week. It is also up triple-digits (126.39%) over the last year.

This morning it looks to open above yesterday's all-time-high, $607.26, up $6.88 (+1.14%) at $611.86 in pre-market action. 

Among the other names, Cameco is up 200.19% over the twelve months to yesterday, Prysmian is up 168.65%, Lynas is up 125.90% and First Solar, if your mandate says you should have solar, is the laggard, up 50.41% over the last year. 

GE Vernova's doppelgänger, Siemen's Energy is up 164.61% over the period. 

Nvidia is up 99.09% for the year and has started the breakout to new all-time highs. 

This all goes back to January - February 2024:

January 10, 2024 -"BlackRock Acquisition Triples Its Business of Building Airports, Roads, and Utilities"

And it was off to the races.  

September 18, 2024 - Big Money: "Microsoft, BlackRock form group to raise $100 billion to invest in AI data centers and power"

Possibly also of interest, the infrastructure series:

February 23 = The Infrastructure Theme Is For Real (PWR)

January 31:"KKR raises $6.4 bln for its Asian infrastructure fund" (KKR)

January 8 "East Coast land continues to collapse at a worrying rate It's steadily sinking or subsiding, which is destabilizing levees, roads, and airports."
January 8: "There’s a Shortage of Electrical Wires, Transformers. That’s Good for These Stocks."
January 12: (Big) Batteries: "‘World leading' Tesla battery online to help kick coal out of Hawaii" (TSLA)
January 12: BlackRock Goes Large-by-Large In Infrastructure (BLK)"
January 15: "Investors look set to pour cash into infrastructure following BlackRock acquisition" (BLK)
January 16: "BlackRock Acquisition Triples Its Business of Building Airports, Roads, and Utilities"
I'm telling ya, this is a big deal. Not just for the $12.5 billion purchase price but for the $100+ billion in assets that GIP manages.
January 23: Minerals-for-Infrastructure: "Congo and China Talking $7 Billion In Finance, Tshisekedi Says"
January 23: DEI and ESG Live On, We Just Won't Talk About Them (BLK)
That's one lesson from BlackRock's purchase of Global Infrastructure Partners.
January 29: RAND: "The U.S. Must Close the Long-Distance Power Transmission Gap with China" Or, as the Financial Times put it, a bit more succinctly, February 1, 2024:

KKR has raised a record $6.4bn for its latest Asian infrastructure fund, capping a month of frenzied investment activity in the sector at a time when broader private equity fundraising has slowed.
—KKR raises record $6.4bn for Asia fund in infrastructure rush

Related, December 4, 2023:
Russell Napier Called It: "The Eyepopping Factory Construction Boom in the US"

And possibly most important:

March 18 - In Nvidia's World, If You (and your company) Don't Have Money You Will Not Be Able To Compete (NVDA)

March 20, 2025 -  "Money Managers Rush to Invest in The World’s ‘Essential Plumbing’"

October 3, 2025 - BlackRock's Global Infrastructure Partners Circling $40 Billion Data Center Purchase (BLK)

And many, many more as the best analyst I've ever met once said to me: "A trend is emerging." 

Friday, March 27, 2026

"Australia rare-earth stocks soar as China clamps down on exports"

Lynas is our preferred rare earth name, despite MP getting most of the attention (and U.S. government money). 

From Nikkei Asia, March 27: 

Market cap triples in year for Lynas, largest rare-earth separator outside China, on Japan, US deals 

Rare-earth stocks in Australia have risen sharply over the past year amid growing demand from sources other than China for the metals, found in everything from mobile phones and cars to modern weapons.

Lynas Rare Earths, the world's largest commercial rare-earth separator outside China, announced this month it had locked in purchase price guarantees with a joint venture co-owned by Japanese trading house Sojitz. It marks the first time a Japanese client has committed to a price floor for a rare-earth deal.

"The implementation of fair market pricing will reduce price volatility for Lynas and enable continued growth and investment in our operations," Lynas CEO Amanda Lacaze said in a press release.

The sides have agreed to a minimum price of $110 per kilogram for neodymium-praseodymium, which is used to make magnets for vehicles, among other applications. Lynas is entering into a similar deal with the U.S. Defense Department.

Lynas' market capitalization reached 20 billion Australian dollars ($14 billion) as of Friday, roughly tripling in value over 12 months. The company has surpassed the $9.4 billion market cap of its largest U.S. rival, MP Materials, and is gaining ground on China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Tech, the biggest Chinese player with a market cap of $24 billion....

....MUCH MORE, an excellent overview. 

China Northern is an old friend formerly known as "Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Rare-Earth Hi-Tech Co., Ltd." As noted in a 2024 post on Baidu: 

....China has a communist government, they pick winners and losers in business, that's what communists do.

We first became aware of how important this understanding is in the case of the Chinese rare earth companies. Here's a snip from a 2009 post, "Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Rare-Earth Hi-Tech Co., Ltd. UP 10% Wednesday (600111: Shanghai)", this is a couple years before the twenty-tweens rare earth mania:

....China's moves to tighten control on the mining and export of a class of metal ores called rare earth are aimed at attracting high-tech manufacturing to Inner Mongolia, and not at dominating the market, a senior Chinese official said.

Wednesday's comments by Zhao Shuanglin, vice chairman of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, appear aimed at quelling concerns that China is trying to dominate the global market for rare-earth resources, used in some environmentally friendly technologies. Rare-earth metals greatly improve batteries made for hybrid cars....

...China also is taking steps to consolidate its rare-earth industry. Mr. Zhao, who said he runs the region's industrial policy, said Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Rare Earth Hi-Tech Co. would lead that consolidation. The move is aimed at creating a group of rare-earth miners and processors in the region's western parts. Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Rare Earth's stock rose 7.6% in Shanghai trading Wednesday.

"Most of the consolidation is complete," Mr. Zhao said. "We want to build Baotou into an international rare earth production base."....

By November 2010 the story was:
"Rare Earth: Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Rare Earth Hi Tech Co. Ltd. Reports 369% Increase in Q3 Net":
This is the big dog.
And one that the Chinese government says will be on top of the mandated industry consolidation.

IMBSREHTCL was chosen to succeed.

In the case of artificial intelligence it was apparent by 2017 that Baidu, known in the West as a search engine, was the anointed one for machine learning and such.

Some more 2009 posts on "IMBSREHTCL":

Again, years before the mania and "Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Rare-Earth Hi-Tech Co., Ltd." being on everyone's lips and our chosen tagline coming from one of the best books on investing ever written:

"...Words like 'uranium', 'rare earths', etc. seem to be magic to
 those unsuspecting who are often fleeced..."
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival
Simon & Schuster, 1935

Monday, February 2, 2026

"Japan Boosts Deep-Sea Mining Plan to Cut Rare-Earth Reliance"

This is existential for Japan, they will not allow China to choke off the Japanese military and economy.*

Following on January 11's "Japan sets sail on rare earth hunt as China tightens supplies".

From Bloomberg, February 2:

Japan is accelerating a decade-old plan to extract rare earths from the deep seabed, an ambitious initiative given extra impetus by the country’s drive to cut reliance on Chinese supply.

A state-owned vessel is scheduled to return to port this month after fitting equipment below the surface of Japanese waters, near a coral atoll 2,000 kilometers (1,243 miles) from Tokyo. The aim is to pull metal-bearing mud from the seabed for tests as early as February 2027, according to the government body running the project.

“It’s about economic security,” said Shoichi Ishii, program director for Japan’s National Platform for Innovative Ocean Developments. “The country needs to secure a supply chain of rare earths. However expensive they may be, the industry needs them.”

Rare earths — a set of metallic elements used in smartphones, electric vehicles and fighter jets — have become a political flashpoint, with China using its dominance of the global supply chain as a crucial bargaining chip in last year’s trade war with the US. More recently, Beijing banned exports to Japan of products destined for use in military applications, marking an escalation of a diplomatic spat between the countries.

Read More: Japan Seeks Support as Fears Rise Over China’s Rare Earth Grip

This is an issue for Japan. Despite spending heavily on securing alternative supplies — from investing in a separation facility in France to long-term financial backing for Australian miner Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. — the country still imports roughly 70% of its rare earths from China.

Mining the seabed will not solve this problem any time soon. Even if tests were to reveal a promising resource, cost and logistics would present major challenges to any potential developer. Large-scale commercial mining of metals from the seabed has never been achieved, despite widespread exploration.

The US — which hasn’t ratified a United Nations treaty that regulates deep-seabed mining in international waters — has moved to accelerate the approval process after President Donald Trump last year signed an executive order “unleashing America’s Offshore Critical Minerals and Resources.” But the latest changes  are likely to raise concerns globally, with the International Seabed Authority now finalizing its own rules governing environmental safeguards.

Japan’s project, however, lies within its own territorial waters – near Minamitori Island, which marks the country’s easternmost point. According to the Cabinet Office, the cross-ministerial body responsible for deep-sea mining, around 350 tons per day of mud will be brought to the surface from a depth of between 5 and 6 kilometers....

....MUCH MORE
*
December 2021 - China and Japan: Thinking About President Xi and Prince Kanenaga  

The long history of Chinese arrogance.
For 100 years, from the Chinese/Mongol attempts to conquer Japan in 1274 and 1281 to the demands of the founder of the Ming Dynasty from 1369 to 1382 that Japan pay tribute.

A repost from December 2018.

Sometimes when thinking about what President Xi is up to Chairman Mao comes to mind. I mean with posts like:

Mao obviously comes to a lot of minds.
And then when President Trump tweets: "Relations with China have taken a BIG leap forward!" it's inescapable. or as they say in Hollywood, "A little too on the nose?"

There is however another Chinese emperor leader that should also come to mind, Ming Dynasty founder Emperor Hongwu.
Upon gaining control in 1368, Hongwu ('Vastly Martial') began demanding tribute from all the surrounding lands, including Japan.

We mentioned this obliquely in 2014's Oil and China's Territorial Ambitions: "The World Is the World's World". Here is a better, more scholarly reference via Oxford Journals' Chinese Journal of International Politics, Summer 2012:
...The threat of military force was evident in Ming China’s effort to bring Japan into the tribute system. Japan’s Prince Kanenaga imprisoned and executed a number of the Chinese envoys that Emperor Hongwu had sent in 1369 to demand tribute, apparently angered at the condescending tone of the diplomatic letter denoting Chinese superiority. When the Ming court threatened invasion, the Japanese reminded it of the Mongols’ failed attempts in 1281 to conquer Japan. A letter Kanenaga sent in 1382 explicitly denied the legitimacy of Chinese dominance: ‘Now the world is the world’s world; it does not belong to a single ruler … . I hear that China has troops able to fight a war, but my small country also has plans of defence … . How could we kneel to and acknowledge Chinese overlordship!’88  ...

Jus' sayin' Mr. President Xi, jus' sayin'. 

And that 2014 post:

Oil and China's Territorial Ambitions: "The World Is the World's World"
....The part of the headline in quotation marks is not to be found in the story, rather it is from a 1382 letter sent by Japan’s Prince Kanenaga to the Hongwu Emperor of China, founder of the Ming Dynasty, explicitly denying the legitimacy of Chinese dominance:

Heaven and earth are vast, they are not monopolized by one ruler.
The universe is great and wide, and the various countries are created each to have a share in its rule.
Now the world is the world's world; it does not belong to a single person.
For some reason I've never been able to get that quote out of my head but I promise that is as esoteric as I'll ever get.
Here's a ref. via Oxford Journals.

UPDATE: The Oxford Journals link to The Chinese Journal of International Politics is now gated with a stub entry.
If interested here is "Chinese Hegemony: Grand Strategy and International Institutions in East" with the quote and some background on what Prince Kanenaga was dealing with.
Quite an inspiring guy.

 

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

Rare Earths: "Australia's Lynas reports Q2 revenue surge on higher prices" (LYC.ax)

Our preference among the Western mines due to the heavy rare earth resource/reserves.

From Nikkei Asia, January 21: 

Growing demand for non-China rare earths provides tailwind, CEO says 

Australia's Lynas Rare Earths reported a rise of 43% in second-quarter revenue compared to the same period last year, as increased demand for rare earths outside of China pushed prices higher.

Sales revenue for the quarter ending Dec. 31 came to 201.9 million Australian dollars ($135.9 million), despite a shortfall in production due to two power disruptions at its Kalgoorlie processing facility in Western Australia during November and planned maintenance at its facility in Malaysia. Lynas' Australia-listed shares jumped as much as 8% in morning trading on Wednesday.

Prices of rare earths have been rising as the U.S. and other countries try to reduce dependence on China, which produces the vast majority of the world's rare earth materials. The average selling price for Lynas' products was AU$85.6 per kilogram, and the company said positive market sentiment is expected to continue this month.

Its total rare earth output was 2,382 metric tons, a 40% drop from the previous quarter.

Lynas CEO and Managing Director Amanda Lacaze said prices for the company's products will continue to strengthen in January.

"Frankly, geopolitics continue to be our friend," she said in an earnings call on Wednesday, Australia time. "Although we are yet to finalize various agreements with governments, the policies which have been particularly implemented by the U.S. government have already fostered more functional market dynamics."

Lacaze will step down in June after more than a decade in her role. The company did not share any details on the search for a replacement.

Lynas mines rare earth ore from its Mt Weld mine in Australia and processes it at its Kuantan facility in Malaysia. The company expects to have its first production of samarium, which is used in magnets for defense applications and green-technology, out of Malaysia in the fourth quarter of 2026. It expects to bring online new capacity to separate up to 5,000 ton a year of heavy rare-earth feedstock....

....MUCH MORE 

Tuesday, December 9, 2025

"How Japan Built a Rare-Earth Supply Chain Without China"

From the New York Times, December 8:

The 15-year effort by Japan is a model for countries now scrambling to reduce their dependence on Beijing’s critical metals. 

Sojitz, a Japanese conglomerate, turned to Lynas, an Australian mining company, to build a rare-earth supply chain outside China. Lynas mines in Australia and refines in Malaysia.

The world reacted with alarm this year when Beijing introduced waves of export controls on rare earths, the minerals vital to the manufacturing of everything from cars to advanced electronics. For Japan, the experience felt like déjà vu.

China maintains a near monopoly on the supply of the metals. Japan learned that the hard way in 2010 when China effectively cut it off during a territorial dispute between the countries. Tokyo has since quietly stitched together a supply chain that is considerably less dependent on China. For Japan, that is an important hedge to political risk, as a recent flare-up in tensions between the nations underscores.

As the United States and other nations scramble to secure rare earths outside China and build up their domestic supplies, Japan’s experience provides lessons in how it can be done, according to interviews with current and former government officials, business executives and industry experts in Japan.

“The urgency of the rare-earths situation is just now dawning on the United States and Europe,” said Naoki Kobayashi, an official working in the minerals division of Japan’s trade ministry. “For Japan, this painful lesson came 15 years ago,” he said.

President Trump has said he believes it will take the United States about a year to secure ample rare-earth supplies. But Japan is a case study in how hard it is to pull out of China’s grip — especially its extremely cost competitive rare-earth processing facilities. Experts say such an effort requires both sustained government support and international collaboration.

Supply Shock
In September 2010, a collision near disputed islands between a Chinese fishing trawler and two Japanese Coast Guard vessels escalated into a diplomatic and economic crisis. Japan detained the captain of the Chinese ship, and Beijing, in retaliation, implemented an unannounced, two-month embargo on rare-earth exports.

At first, the significance of China’s move was lost on some Japanese officials.

Tatsuya Terazawa was in charge of economic policy at Japan’s trade ministry in 2010. He recalled that the ministry’s lead auto industry official rushed to his desk, warning that the entire automotive supply chain could be suspended because of the sudden cutoff.

“I had to confess, I had zero knowledge about rare earths,” Mr. Terazawa said. He said his colleague explained that these materials were essential ingredients for the magnets used in motors across Japan’s auto sector. And Japan, like most industrialized nations, had ceded control of this vital supply almost entirely to China.

Mr. Terazawa was responsible for developing the trade ministry’s next suite of economic policies. He compiled a package, worth a little over $1 billion at the time, aimed at reducing Japan’s supply chain vulnerability to rare earths. It included substantial support for Japanese groups to diversify rare-earth sources.

“At the time, I was criticized that I was demanding much more money than necessary,” Mr. Terazawa said. “But I was determined that Japan never repeat this incident.”

Finding Lynas
The timing was, in some ways, opportune. Sojitz, a Japanese conglomerate, and Jogmec, the government body overseeing mineral resource security, were seeking non-Chinese rare-earth options. And Lynas, an Australian mining company, was dealing with financial difficulties.

Lynas was trying to create the world’s first integrated rare-earths supply chain without using China, instead mining the ores in Australia and refining them in Malaysia. But it was struggling to amass the capital it needed to increase production at its Malaysian refining site.

Sojitz had to find sources of rare earths outside China. Without stable supplies, “factories in many places would have to stop operating,” said Kosuke Uemura, the chief executive of Sojitz. At the time, “Lynas was the only option,” he said.

In 2011, Jogmec and Sojitz did a deal that provided $250 million in loans and equity to Lynas. The transaction secured for Japan a long-term supply of rare earths sourced outside China.

Today, in Western Australia, workers on the remote Mount Weld volcanic plug are flown out from Perth on rotations to extract rare-earth ore from an open-pit mine owned by Lynas

The partially purified concentrate is then shipped 5,000 miles to the company’s facility in Kuantan, Malaysia — until this year, the only large-scale rare-earth separation plant operating outside China. There, the materials are refined through a chemical process into individual rare-earth oxides pure enough to use in manufacturing.

From Malaysia, the metals are transported another 3,000 miles to Japan, where Sojitz manages distribution to domestic magnet makers. In Japan, the magnets are used in a number of products, including vehicles produced by automakers like Toyota.

Early Challenges
Japan has significantly bolstered its supply chain resilience. While industry estimates placed Japanese rare-earth imports from China at 90 percent or more during the 2010 trade dispute, that figure now stands closer to 60 percent to 70 percent.

Sojitz received its first large shipments of rare earths from the Malaysia facility in 2012 and has continued to expand the breadth of metals it imports. In October, it added a type of specialized, heat-resistant magnet ingredients to its portfolio.

According to Mr. Uemura, the Sojitz chief executive, the toughest bottleneck was the refining process in Malaysia. The chemical separation of rare earths produces large volumes of acidic waste and thousands of tons of low-level radioactive residue. Proper management and disposal of the waste is expensive and time consuming.

Between 2011 and 2012, the Lynas facility in Malaysia faced months of delays because of fierce local opposition and legal challenges. The facility began operating only after it revised its residue management plan multiple times.

In contrast, Chinese processing factories are often lightly regulated, and some illegally operated, creating toxic waste sites.

As a result, Mr. Uemura said, Sojitz and Lynas have higher costs than Chinese rivals and require public backing. “If we were to compete normally with China, we’d be playing on a different field altogether,” he said. “This gap is absolutely unbridgeable.”

Export Controls
This year, China introduced expansive rare-earth export controls, first in April and again in October, restricting the materials themselves and the processing technology. Beijing’s measures targeted all exports, not just those bound for Japan....

....MUCH MORE 

Some of our posts along the way: 

May 2021 - "Japan’s global rare earths quest holds lessons for the US and Europe"

October 2010:
 
Oct. 2010  

July 2011 
Rare Earths: Japan Finds Huge Undersea Deposits; German Industry Dubious; Stocks Droop (AVL; MCP; REE)

Stocks trade generally mournful and reflective.
In early premartket, Molycorp is down, $1.54 (2.57%) at $58.30, Rare Element is down 2.65% at $10.64 and Avalon is down 2.92%
Auspicious update, below....
Sept. 2011 
Predictions: Rare Earth Demand 2015-2020 (MCP; REE; AVL)
June 2012 
Japan has taken the rare earth sector very seriously since prices spiked ten-fold a couple years ago, some of our links are below the jump.

July 2021
Japan's Responses In the Event Of A Chinese Attack On Taiwan
You can see Japan's quandary if you follow the islands down to Okinawa and beyond.... 

January 2023
"Japan dives into rare earth mining under the sea"
It's taken them long enough.*

Here's an interesting map from the article, as we've said over the years, Japan has a real interest in who controls Taiwan:

https://i0.wp.com/asiatimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/japan-maritime-zone-e1673293205111.jpeg?w=1200&ssl=1


And the reason I said Europe risks becoming a satrapy of China?

The satrapy bit was the outro from December 8's "JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a ‘real problem’".

Monday, October 20, 2025

Why Did President Zelensky Come Away From His Meeting Without Tomahawk Missiles? Think Rare Earths

There are, of course, a few reasons that President Trump is reluctant to send the missiles to NATO partners for resale to Ukraine, the most commonly uttered example is a determination to not expand and extend the war.

However, there are a couple rare earth angles that are also behind the decision.

On July 2, 2025 China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi held an extended (four hours) meeting with former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, now the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, as close to a Foreign Minister as the Eurocrats have under their non-federal form of governance.

From the South China Morning Post, July 4: 

Exclusive | China tells EU it does not want to see Russia lose its war in Ukraine: sources
Wang Yi speaks of concern that US could shift whole focus in China’s direction in talks with top EU diplomat Beijing 

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the European Union’s top diplomat on Wednesday that Beijing did not want to see a Russian loss in Ukraine because it feared the United States would then shift its whole focus to Beijing, according to several people familiar with the exchange.

The comment, to the EU’s Kaja Kallas, would confirm what many in Brussels believe to be Beijing’s position but jar with China’s public utterances. The foreign ministry regularly says China is “not a party” to the war. Some EU officials involved were surprised by the frankness of Wang’s remarks.

However, Wang is said to have rejected the accusation that China was materially supporting Russia’s war effort, financially or militarily, insisting that if it was doing so, the conflict would have ended long ago.

During a marathon four-hour debate on a wide range of geopolitical and commercial grievances, Wang was said to have given Kallas – the former Estonian prime minister who only late last year took up her role as the bloc’s de facto foreign affairs chief – several “history lessons and lectures”.

Some EU officials felt he was giving her a lesson in realpolitik, part of which focused on Beijing’s belief that Washington would soon turn its full attention eastward, two officials said.

One interpretation of Wang’s statement in Brussels is that while China did not ask for the war, its prolongation may suit Beijing’s strategic needs, so long as the US remains engaged in Ukraine....

....MUCH MORE

Someone leaked to the SCMP. It probably wasn't the Europeans.

One way for China to keep Russia in the fight is to pressure the U.S. generally on the critical minerals.

Another is to focus on the Tomahawks themselves. They cannot be built without the use of dysprosium magnets in the actuators that move the control fins.

Dysprosium is a Heavy Rare Earth Element (HREE) and America's only rare earth mine at Mountain Pass doesn't produce it. Australia's Lynas produces some but unlike the light rare earths, the HREEs are pretty much all found in Chinese geologies.

If interested see last week's reposted article from 2012 "The only five rare earth elements that matter": 

[Jack Lifton writing]....I follow four or five critical REEs that each have individual markets. One of them is neodymium, because it’s the most important REE used in permanent magnets. The others are heavy rare earth elements (HREEs), including europium, terbium, dysprosium and yttrium. The latter isn’t really an REE, but it’s associated with them. As the market corrects to reasonable prices, people are coming to understand this.... 

Neodymium magnets are not as robust as those made from dysprosium and are more likely to fail under thermal and physical stress, leaving you with an unguided missile flying hither and yon.

As things stand right now, China not only has one heck of a monopoly on the majority of the rare earth supply chains, from mine to fabrication but absolutely controls the one for the absurdly critical input into Tomahawk missiles.

Oh, and after lobbing a bunch of the Tomahawks at the Houthis in Yemen, we see this at ZeroHedge October 14: "Military Analyst Warns US Doesn't Have Enough Tomahawks To Send To Ukraine".

All because China found and exploited a point of maximum pressure to implement their geostrategic worldview.

Thursday, July 10, 2025

"Pentagon to become largest shareholder in rare earth miner MP Materials; shares surge 40%"

We, of course, downplayed MP in April 18's "The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions" (LYC.ax; MP):

...Although MP Materials is getting the attention in the U.S., Australia's Lynas has a better mix of the various rare earths.... 

Who needs the Memento mori guy when you have the stock market to remind you "you are not the boss of the universe"*

From CNBC, July 10:

  • The Defense Department will buy $400 million of preferred stock in MP Materials.
  • MP Materials owns the only operational rare earth mine in the U.S. at Mountain Pass, California.
  • It will build a second magnet manufacturing facility in the U.S. with the support of the Pentagon. 

The Defense Department will become the largest shareholder in rare earth miner MP Materials

after agreeing to buy $400 million of its preferred stock, the company said Thursday.

MP Materials owns the only operational rare earth mine in the U.S. at Mountain Pass, California, about 60 miles outside Las Vegas. Proceeds from the Pentagon investment will be used to expand MP’s rare earths processing capacity and magnet production.

Shares of MP Materials jumped more than 40% premarket on the news.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in April that the Trump administration was considering making direct equity investments in critical mineral companies to break U.S. dependence on China.

“This initiative marks a decisive action by the Trump administration to accelerate American supply chain independence,” MP Materials CEO James Litinsky said in a statement.

The Pentagon is buying a newly created class of preferred shares convertible into MP Materials’ common stock, in addition to a warrant that allows the U.S. to buy additional common stock.

The convertible shares and the exercise of the common stock warrant would equal about a 15% stake in MP Materials as of July 9, nearly twice the 8.61% held by Litinsky and the 8.27% held by BlackRock Fund Advisors, according to FactSet data....

....MUCH MORE 
*"Remember that you will die," a shorter version of "Respice post te! Hominem te esse memento! Memento mori!" i.e. Dude, look behind you, you're just a guy, remember-you'll die.

—Supposedly the words a slave whispered to a returning Roman general during his triumphal return.
Cambridge classicist Mary Beard makes a strong case against the simplistic popular conception in her book "The Roman Triumph".
From Friends of Classics Reviews:

...Balancing the enemy captives and bringing up the rear of the triumphal procession were the victorious general’s troops, chanting the mysterious “io triumpe”.

Less mysterious were the rude chants that the triumphing troops were licensed to direct at their general. Suetonius gives us a sample of what Caesar’s troops contributed: “Romans, watch your wives, the bald adulterer’s back home. You fucked away in Gaul the gold you borrowed here in Rome”.

Traditionally these chants have been seen as “apotropaic”, designed to ward off envy and the evil eye in the moment when the successful general was most vulnerable. This is consistent with what is perhaps the best-known aspect of the traditional picture of the triumph, the slave who supposedly stood behind the general in his chariot to remind him that he was not a god, by repeating the words “Look behind. Remember that you are a man”. In the film Quo Vadis? the slave’s words receive an unintended comic twist when they are delivered to a triumphing Marcus Vinicius as he ogles a pretty girl in the crowd (nothing wrong with Marcus Vinicius!).

Beard points out that the slave and his cautionary words have been cobbled together out of bits and pieces of evidence from different contexts and periods and that no single text gives us the whole picture. She is similarly sceptical about the modern theory that the triumphing general impersonated the god Jupiter Best and Greatest, dressed in the clothes of his cult statue and with his face similarly painted red.

The impersonation of the god, the admonitory slave and the apotropaic songs all make a tempting package, but the evidence for the triumphator’s impersonation of Jupiter is very slender. What we can say is that Roman authors of the late Republic and early Empire were particularly concerned with the line between the human and the divine, and with the problematic concept of the divine human. Eventually, the emperor would be hailed as a god and receive divine honours, but this would be a slow and difficult process....

Saturday, June 21, 2025

Barron's: "Move Over, BigDog. Humanoid Robots Are Finally Here. How to Invest."

This week's Barron's was jam-packed with goodies. Here's one of them, June 20: 

Humanoid robots are hot, apparently. A China stock index of companies involved with their development is beating the world market by 16 points this year. A new report from UBS says the world will have 300 million humanoids by 2050. An earlier one from Morgan Stanley puts the number at a billion, and the size of the market by then at $5 trillion—twice what the top 20 car makers bring in today.

There are loads of stock picks, for those so inclined. Among UBS’s favorites are Nvidia; a rare-earth metals producer called Lynas; Honeywell; Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing; Cognex for machine vision and Amphenol for sensors. Morgan Stanley likes Tesla, Nvidia, and Alphabet, and just published a Humanoid 100 index of companies making all sorts of robo-doodads, from planetary roller screws to harmonic reducers. For investors who want one-click exposure, there’s the newly launched KraneShares Global Humanoid & Embodied Intelligence Index exchange-traded fund, which costs 0.69% a year.

It’s entirely possible that this investing theme is both too late and too early; many of the stocks have run, and the production ramp might not hit big numbers for the better part of a decade. Personally, I’m an anti-themist, preferring to let an S&P 500 fund handle the Darwinian allocation of big companies strangling new markets for profits. But for the robo-curious, let me run through some basics.

Remember back when those videos popped up on YouTube with a headless four-legged robot from Boston Dynamics that could walk and jump and keep its balance when pushed? That was BigDog, created in 2005, with funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or Darpa. It never made it out of boot camp; the gasoline engine was deemed too loud for combat, and a battery version couldn’t carry enough weight.

Today, for $1,600 in China, or $2,500 on Amazon.com, you can buy a UniTree Go2 robot dog that can run, sit, shake hands, stand on its front legs and kick its back legs in the air, and even move autonomously, once the space has been mapped with Lidar. Amazon’s page calls this a toy. UniTree calls it a partner.

For $16,000 in China, or just over $27,000 with U.S. shipping from RobotShop.com, you can step up to the UniTree G1 Humanoid Robot—humanoid meaning humanlike in appearance, with two arms, two legs, a head, and optional dexterous hands. UniTree calls this an agent. It can hop on one leg, crack nuts, open bottles, and flip pancakes—not simultaneously, so far as I know. One thing it can’t do, at just over four feet tall, is reach top shelves. There’s a much more advanced version that’s nearly six feet tall, called H1, that starts at $90,000 in China.

Robots aren’t new as an investing theme. In a 2013 article on the subject, I highlighted three industrial players. Since then, Rockwell Automation and Switzerland’s ABB have quadrupled shareholder money in dollar terms. Germany’s Kuka was bought out by China’s Midea, an appliance maker, in 2016. In a 2017 cover story on robots I mentioned those stocks along with the Robo Global Robotics & Automation ETF, which has since underperformed the market; Japan’s Fanuc, which has managed to lose money; Amazon and Alphabet, which have been winners; and a chip maker that was still five years away from becoming mostly an artificial intelligence player. “Chips from companies with videogame expertise, like Nvidia, make quick work of the heavy thinking,” I wrote. That one is up more than 5,000%.....

....MUCH MORE 

And another theme our long-suffering (sorry about the Ozzy DNA post) long-time readers will recognize:

Cameco Stock and Other Ways to Play the Overseas Nuclear Energy Boom 

They dig into the current prospects for this bit of added-value from 2022:

Uranium Miner Cameco and Brookfield Renewable Partners To Buy Nuke Maker Westinghouse (CCJ; BEP)

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

"The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions" (LYC.ax; MP)

From The Center for Strategic & International Studies, April 14:

On April 4, China’s Ministry of Commerce imposed export restrictions on seven rare earth elements (REEs) and magnets used in the defense, energy, and automotive sectors in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff increases on Chinese products. The new restrictions apply to 7 of 17 REEs—samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium—and requires companies to secure special export licenses to export the minerals and magnets.

Q1: To what extent will the most recent export restrictions on rare earths impact U.S. sourcing of these critical minerals for defense technologies?

A1: There are various types of export restrictions: non-automatic licensing, tariffs, quotas, and an outright ban. The new restrictions are not a ban; rather, they require firms to apply for a license to export rare earths. This development has three implications: first, there will likely be a pause in exports as the Chinese government establishes this licensing system. Second, there is also likely to be disruptions in supply to some U.S. firms given that the announcement also placed 16 U.S. entities on its export control list, limiting them from receiving dual-use goods. All but one of the firms on the list are in the defense and aerospace industries. It is unclear how China will implement the new licensing system. And third, the licensing system may be dynamic and could incentivize countries across the world to cooperate with China to prevent disruptions in their rare earths supply.

Q2: What is the significance of the focus on heavy rare earths given U.S. supply chain vulnerabilities?

A2: The restrictions apply to seven medium and heavy rare earths: samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium. The United States is particularly vulnerable for these supply chains. Until 2023, China accounted for 99 percent of global heavy REEs processing, with only minimal output from a refinery in Vietnam. However, that facility has been shut down for the past year due to a tax dispute, effectively giving China a monopoly over supply. China did not impose restrictions on light rare earths, for which a more diverse set of countries undertake processing.

Q3: Why are rare earths significant to U.S. national security?

A3: REEs are crucial for a range of defense technologies, including F-35 fighter jets, Virginia- and Columbia-class submarines, Tomahawk missiles, radar systems, Predator unmanned aerial vehicles, and the Joint Direct Attack Munition series of smart bombs. For example, the F-35 fighter jet contains over 900 pounds of REEs. An Arleigh Burke-class DDG-51 destroyer requires approximately 5,200 pounds, while a Virginia-class submarine uses around 9,200 pounds.

The United States is already on the back foot when it comes to manufacturing these defense technologies. China is rapidly expanding its munitions production and acquiring advanced weapons systems and equipment at a pace five to six times faster than the United States. While China is preparing with a wartime mindset, the United States continues to operate under peacetime conditions. Even before the latest restrictions, the U.S. defense industrial base struggled with limited capacity and lacked the ability to scale up production to meet defense technology demands. Further bans on critical minerals inputs will only widen the gap, enabling China to strengthen its military capabilities more quickly than the United States.

Q4: Is the U.S. rare earths industry ready to fill the gap in the event of a shortfall?....

....MUCH MORE

Although MP Materials is getting the attention in the U.S., Australia's Lynas has a better mix of the various rare earths.

If interested we have quite a few posts on both, in the case of MP back before the bankruptcy and reorg, when it was known as Molycorp, e.g. 2011's

Molycorp Beats; Raises; Decries Shortsellers as Spawn of Satan (MCP)
[a close reading of the press release reveals there is no use of the term 'Spawn of Satan' -ed]

Often introducing a post with a quote from one of the, if not the, best books on investing and life:

...Words like "uranium", "rare earths", etc. seem to be magic to
 those unsuspecting who are often fleeced...
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival
Simon & Schuster, 1935

If interested use the 'search blog' box upper left: Molycorp and Lynas.

Always keeping in mind it's the refining capacity that is the rare bit.
(not to be confused with the Welsh dish)

Sunday, October 27, 2024

Pssst: Dysprosium

 From the New York Times via the Japan Times, October 27:

...One example of China’s growing power is dysprosium, a rare earth that sells for more than $100 a pound. Previously used mainly as an additive in powerful magnets for electric cars, dysprosium is highly heat resistant. That makes it an increasingly important component of advanced semiconductors.

In the past few years, Nvidia and other computer chip manufacturers have changed the material used in hundreds of tiny electricity management devices, called capacitors, on each chip. The capacitors are now made from ultrapure dysprosium. China’s refineries produce 99.9% of the world’s dysprosium, mostly at a single refinery in Wuxi, near Shanghai.

That refinery is one of the last two in China that are still in foreign hands, after the government’s purchase or nationalization of the rest of the industry. The longtime owner of both refineries is a Canadian company, Neo Performance Materials.

Neo recently announced that, by the end of the year, it would sell an 86% stake in the Wuxi refinery to Shenghe Resources, a Chinese company traded on the Shanghai stock market. Shenghe’s biggest shareholder is China’s Ministry of Land Resources. Neo is closing the other refinery, 400 miles north in Zibo, China, and transferring its equipment and personnel to Shenghe.

Neo CEO Rahim Suleman said his company would retain an ability to sell to foreign companies. It has the right to market rare earths to international customers from the Wuxi refinery for five years. In addition, Neo has another refinery in Estonia that processes some rare earths, although not dysprosium. It has built a new factory in Zibo to turn rare earths into catalytic converter chemicals for cars.

China’s ever-stronger reins on rare earth supply chains have accelerated efforts to set up supply chains in other countries.

Solvay, a Belgian company, refines tiny quantities of dysprosium in France and said it planned to increase production. An Australian company, Lynas, said it would start refining dysprosium in Malaysia next year. Work has begun on a refinery in Texas.

But all of these plans face obstacles. Few mines outside China and Myanmar, a restive nation on China’s southwest border, have commercially viable concentrations of dysprosium. Chinese companies have been buying stakes or rights to production in mines being developed in Tanzania, Greenland and Australia. And rare earth refineries often take years to get going.

Producing the ultrapure dysprosium required for the computer chips that run artificial intelligence programs is particularly difficult: It took Neo seven years of trial and error to master the 100-step chemical process at its Wuxi refinery. Solvay said its initial increase in dysprosium output early next year would be for magnets, a less demanding application....

....MUCH MORE

Also at the Japan Times:

Former yakuza office repurposed to become elderly care facility

Which is of a piece with a couple previous posts:

Tuesday, October 24, 2023

"Malaysia gives nod for Australian miner Lynas to import, process rare earths until March 2026" (LYC.ax)

The stock is up 12.36% (+0.75) at $6.82 on the news.

From the Associated Press, October 24:

Malaysia’s government said Tuesday it will allow Lynas Rare Earth to continue to import and process rare earths until March 2026, after the Australian miner proposed a new technology to extract radioactive elements from the waste it produces.

The Lynas refinery in Malaysia, its first outside China producing minerals that are crucial to high-tech manufacturing, has been operating in central Pahang state since 2012. But the company has been embroiled in a dispute over radiation from waste accumulating at the plant.

The government had ordered Lynas to move its leaching and cracking processes — which produce the radioactive waste from Australian ore — out of the country by the year’s end. It also was not allowed to import raw materials with radioactive elements into the country....

....MUCH MORE 

A couple previous thoughts on the importance of the processing refining and fabrication part of the supply chain:

And as noted in "Rare Earths: Reminder, Combined Brazilian and Vietnamese Resource Base Approximately Equals China's Proven and Probable Reserves":
Mining the stuff is relatively straightforward. The huge difference is that Brazil and Vietnam do not have the refining and fabricating infrastructure that China does....

Another 2023 post on rare earths, this one January 14:

"Huge rare earth metals discovery in Arctic Sweden"
They aren't that rare. Just hard to find in the right proportions of the different rare earth elements. And in concentrations high enough to make extraction a paying proposition.

And requiring some technical expertise to fabricate into end products. It's not as if there are neodymium magnets just laying around... 

And in 2022's "Huge rare earth reserve discovered in Turkey, but experts caution that ‘grade is king’"

Not just grade. The composition of a deposit, the amounts of the 17 rare earth elements is critical. As one example, the Mountain Pass mine in the U.S. despite its relatively high grade (8% REEs) is actually not as valuable as some lower grade mines with a more profitable mix.

Additionally, exploitation of a REE resource is highly dependent on processing and supply chain factors that can not quickly be brought into being, it's one thing to have the deposit, quite another to have, for example, the end product, a neodymium magnet.

We have some experience with this stuff, if interested see after the jump....

....(we've been tracking the doings of the big dog since 2009's "With a Name Like Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Rare-Earth Hi-Tech Co., it has to be good (600111:Shanghai)"

If interested we have hundreds of posts on rare earths.

And dozens on thorium:

Nuclear: "Bill Gates Is Beginning to Dream the Thorium Dream"

The promise of thorium has been a siren song for the last couple decades, back in 2008 I dropped this comment at the WSJ's Environmental Capital blog:
    • C’mon guys, get with it!
      Global warming is so last year.
      Everybody, from Al Gore to the blogs you link to are reinventing themselves and talking energy.
      Energy production
      Energy cost.
      Energy security.
      It’s all about framing and re-framing.
      Low impact man’s time has come and gone. The eco-soirĂ©e has moved on to erudite discussions of thorium between nibbles at the canapĂ©s.
      By this winter the only references to carbon among the salon crowd might be Carbonic acid (H2CO3).
      You watch.

Okay, so I was early.

"Greenland bans uranium mining, blocking vast rare earths project"

The rare earths are often found in proximity to uranium and thorium with their radioactivity:
 
...Words like "uranium", "rare earths", etc. seem to be magic to
 those unsuspecting who are often fleeced...
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival
Simon & Schuster, 1935
 
The ban seems to be aimed at just the radioactive stuff so shouldn't shut down Bill Gates' exploration for cobalt.*
*May 2019
Bezos, Andreessen and Gates Looking For Cobalt In Canada

Not them personally, can you imagine? Tramping around northern Saskatchewan?

Jeff: Bill, does this rock look blue to you?
Bill: I can't see it, let me get my glasses.
Marc: Guys, have I told you all the things I've wanted to tweet since I quit Twitter?
Jeff and Bill: Oh Gawd
No, it's a company they're invested in....

 This article is a bit hyperbolic but the fact China is getting close to firing it up is a pretty big deal.

I wish India were still pressing ahead. Fifteen years ago I would have bet on thorium reactors tripling India's GDP over a few decades but they decided to stick with coal....

Tuesday, January 10, 2023

"Japan dives into rare earth mining under the sea"

It's taken them long enough.*

From Asia Times, January 10:

Japanese move aims to cut current 60% dependence on China and become self-sufficient by end of the decade  

Japan’s effort to mine the seabed is moving from the research and development stage toward resource extraction as technological advance is spurred by the demands of national economic security.

If all goes according to plan, Japan’s current dependence on China for its rare earth metal supplies could be greatly reduced or eliminated by the end of the decade. China currently dominates global production, processing about 85% of the world’s rare earths.

Japan’s new National Security Strategy document, released in December, states that “with regard to supply chain resilience, Japan will curb excessive dependence on specific countries.” 

Furthermore, it will “secure stable supply for critical goods including rare earth, and promote capital reinforcement of private enterprises with critical goods and technologies, and strengthen the function of policy-based finance, in pursuit of protecting and nurturing critical goods.”

The English version is stamped “Provisional Translation,” but the statement is consistent with the original Japanese.

Rare earth metals are a group of 17 heavy metal elements, some of which are of critical importance to the manufacture of electric vehicle motors (dysprosium), wind power generators (neodymium) and other electronic devices. They are used in magnets, batteries, lasers and many other industrial products and processes.

Japan currently imports about 60% of its rare earth metals from China, but they are available in large quantities on the sea floor – if they can be accessed.

Last August and September, Japanese marine engineers working under the auspices of the Cabinet Office’s Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program succeeded in pumping up seabed material from a depth of nearly 2,500 meters in the waters near Minami-Torishima....

....MUCH MORE
Here's an interesting map from the article, as we've said over the years, Japan has a real interest in who controls Taiwan:

https://i0.wp.com/asiatimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/japan-maritime-zone-e1673293205111.jpeg?w=1200&ssl=1

*Previously:
October 2022
"Breaking China’s grip on rare earths markets a ‘pipe dream,’ Australia says"

Better to stick with the battery metals right now, though nickel is going into surplus this quarter or next, copper is as sensitive to the slowdown in Chinese housing construction as it is to upside in the green revolution, cobalt is on the way out of battery chemistry if Mr. Musk has his way and lithium has gotten so expensive it is now a bottleneck on the final-price of electric vehicles.

Of the four we are betting copper trades down to last summer's low of $3.13, and maybe below $3.00 before turning into a shiny red rocketship.

On the headline stuff, somewhere between 2010 and today the U.S. and the West lost their way on the rare earths and we've only posted sporadically since the  Happy Time™ with MolyCorp and all the little scams, all the while reflecting back on what's probably the best book on investing that's been written since de la Vega's Confusion de Confusiones (Amsterdam, 1688):

...Words like "uranium", "rare earths", etc. seem to be magic to
 those unsuspecting who are often fleeced...
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival
Simon & Schuster, 1935

June 2022 "Huge rare earth reserve discovered in Turkey, but experts caution that ‘grade is king’"

Not just grade. The composition of a deposit, the amounts of the 17 rare earth elements is critical. As one example, the Mountain Pass mine in the U.S. despite its relatively high grade (8% REEs) is actually not as valuable as some lower grade mines with a more profitable mix.

Additionally, exploitation of a REE resource is highly dependent on processing and supply chain factors that can not quickly be brought into being, it's one thing to have the deposit, quite another to have, for example, the end product, a neodymium magnet.

We have some experience with this stuff, if interested see after the jump....

(we've been tracking the doings of the big dog since 2009's "With a Name Like Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Rare-Earth Hi-Tech Co., it has to be good (600111:Shanghai)"

If you are interested, I believe MolyCorp's Mountain View mine ended up in Chinese hands leaving Australia's Lynas Corp (LYC.ax) as probably the best in the West. (mentioned in the story below)....
May 2021
"Japan’s global rare earths quest holds lessons for the US and Europe"
The thing that stood out at the time was how open-minded the Japanese were about potential sources. If the scientists said they thought they could recover rare earths from sewage, the government said "Go find out" From offshore deposits? Ditto.*

June 2012  

July 2011 
Rare Earths: Japan Finds Huge Undersea Deposits; German Industry Dubious; Stocks Droop (AVL; MCP; REE)

Stocks trade generally mournful and reflective.
In early premartket, Molycorp is down, $1.54 (2.57%) at $58.30, Rare Element is down 2.65% at $10.64 and Avalon is down 2.92%
Auspicious update, below.

Oct. 2010 
"Japan Scrambles for Rare Earth" (AVL.TO; LYC.AX; MCP) 600111: Shanghai
Oct. 2010 
"Japan's rare earth minerals may run out by March" and Japan to Mine Sewage Sludge, E-Waste for Precious and REE Metals 

And recently in geopolitics:
Chips: Taiwan, Japan Eye 'All Round Cooperation'
China's Emperor Xi And The Threat To Destroy Japan
Japan's Responses In the Event Of A Chinese Attack On Taiwan
You can see Japan's quandary if you follow the islands down to Okinawa and beyond....

Monday, October 31, 2022

"Breaking China’s grip on rare earths markets a ‘pipe dream,’ Australia says"

Better to stick with the battery metals right now, though nickel is going into surplus this quarter or next, copper is as sensitive to the slowdown in Chinese housing construction as it is to upside in the green revolution, cobalt is on the way out of battery chemistry if Mr. Musk has his way and lithium has gotten so expensive it is now a bottleneck on the final-price of electric vehicles.

Of the four we are betting copper trades down to last summer's low of $3.13, and maybe below $3.00 before turning into a shiny red rocketship.

On the headline stuff, somewhere between 2010 and today the U.S. and the West lost their way on the rare earths and we've only posted sporadically since the  Happy Time™ with MolyCorp and all the little scams, all the while reflecting back on what's probably the best book on investing that's been written since de la Vega's Confusion de Confusiones (Amsterdam, 1688):

...Words like "uranium", "rare earths", etc. seem to be magic to
 those unsuspecting who are often fleeced...
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival
Simon & Schuster, 1935

Our last post on rare earths was in June "Huge rare earth reserve discovered in Turkey, but experts caution that ‘grade is king’"

Not just grade. The composition of a deposit, the amounts of the 17 rare earth elements is critical. As one example, the Mountain Pass mine in the U.S. despite its relatively high grade (8% REEs) is actually not as valuable as some lower grade mines with a more profitable mix.

Additionally, exploitation of a REE resource is highly dependent on processing and supply chain factors that can not quickly be brought into being, it's one thing to have the deposit, quite another to have, for example, the end product, a neodymium magnet.

We have some experience with this stuff, if interested see after the jump....

(we've been tracking the doings of the big dog since 2009's "With a Name Like Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Rare-Earth Hi-Tech Co., it has to be good (600111:Shanghai)"

If you are interested, I believe MolyCorp's Mountain View mine ended up in Chinese hands leaving Australia's Lynas Corp (LYC.ax) as probably the best in the West. (mentioned in the story below)

And from Bloomberg via Mining.com, the headline story and then another we've been following for a dozen years or so:

Australia’s resources minister said it was a “pipe dream” that Western countries could soon end their reliance on China for rare earths and critical minerals — vital for the defense, aerospace and automotive industries — due to the Asian powerhouse’s existing grip on global markets.

“That’s a country that has seen this need coming and made the most of it,” Resources Minister Madeleine King told Bloomberg News in an interview.

That won’t stop Australia and the US from working together to boost investment in these critical minerals in an attempt to break China’s monopoly on international supply chains, King said. It was Canberra’s aim to “make the most of the natural endowment we have of these resources, so that we can provide an alternative source of them from China,” she added.

Lithium and other critical minerals including cobalt, platinum and rare earths are used in the manufacturing of a wide range of products which are crucial for national security and the fight against climate change, including jet engines, solar panels and electric vehicles. Australia has some of the world’s largest reserves of these resources and is among the biggest producers of critical minerals globally.

Much of the country’s production capacity for lithium and rare earths is in Western Australia. Siriana Nair, the US Consul General in the state capital Perth, said Australia and the US shared a “strong strategic interest” in securing critical mineral supply chains.

While Nair wouldn’t specify China as the target of growing cooperation between the US and Australia, the US diplomat said having a single source of any critical resource was a “big drawback and a huge flaw.”

“I don’t think anybody in any country wants to have global supply chains dependent on kind of a single point of failure,” she said in a separate interview. “It’s just smart policy.”

Capacity growing
Australia’s King said some exploration was still underway for additional deposits and the peak could still be five or 10 years away. “This is going to be an ongoing demand for a long time. So we need to get there and keep pumping it out,” she said.....

....MUCH MORE

Also at Mining.com October 31:

And some long ago posts:
October 2010:
"Japan Scrambles for Rare Earth" (AVL.TO; LYC.AX; MCP) 600111: Shanghai
Oct. 2010
"Japan's rare earth minerals may run out by March" and Japan to Mine Sewage Sludge, E-Waste for Precious and REE Metals
July 2011
Rare Earths: Japan Finds Huge Undersea Deposits; German Industry Dubious; Stocks Droop (AVL; MCP; REE)
June 2012
Japan Makes Huge Rare Earth Find

And finally:

If interested, the extracts of Confusion de Confusiones at the Hathi Trust is probably the most accessible version online. If your Spanish is up to it the the version at the Digital Library for Dutch Literature is the most complete. (508 page PDF)
And again, the analysis in The Confusion of Confusions :  Between Speculation and Eschatology is a good introduction.