Just a Reminder: "South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc." Is Yet To Be Decided (AMZN)

The retail behemoth says something like 80% of the transaction tax due gets paid, either as sales tax collected by the retailer or self-declared as use tax by the purchaser but that seems awfully high.
I've a sneaking suspicion we are about to find out what actual compliance is this Supreme Court session.

Here's the background at ScotusBlog:

South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
17-494	S.D.	Apr 17, 2018 Tr.Aud.	TBD	TBD	TBD	OT 2017

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should abrogate Quill Corp. v. North Dakota's sales-tax-only, physical-presence requirement.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

• Argument analysis: Justices are divided on whether to overrule precedents on sales-tax collection by remote sellers (Mark Walsh)
• OT2017 #21: "Under the Mattress" (First Mondays)
• Argument preview: Justices to reconsider sales-tax collection in internet era (Mark Walsh)
• Court bulks up this term’s docket (UPDATED) (Amy Howe)
• Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes)

Date	Proceedings and Orders
Oct 02 2017	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 2, 2017)
Oct 16 2017	Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, South Dakota
Oct 19 2017	Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Wayfair, Inc., et al., et al.
Oct 23 2017	Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors filed.
Oct 24 2017	Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 7, 2017.
Nov 01 2017	Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.
Nov 01 2017	Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation filed.

...MORE