I've a sneaking suspicion we are about to find out what actual compliance is this Supreme Court session.
Here's the background at ScotusBlog:
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Apr 17, 2018
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should abrogate Quill Corp. v. North Dakota's sales-tax-only, physical-presence requirement.
- Argument analysis: Justices are divided on whether to overrule precedents on sales-tax collection by remote sellers (Mark Walsh)
- OT2017 #21: "Under the Mattress" (First Mondays)
- Argument preview: Justices to reconsider sales-tax collection in internet era (Mark Walsh)
- Court bulks up this term’s docket (UPDATED) (Amy Howe)
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes)
|Date||Proceedings and Orders|
|Oct 02 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 2, 2017)|
|Oct 16 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, South Dakota|
|Oct 19 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Wayfair, Inc., et al., et al.|
|Oct 23 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors filed.|
|Oct 24 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 7, 2017.|
|Nov 01 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 01 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation filed.|