“White Holes” Could Exist—But That Doesn't Mean They Do
From Nautilus:
A black hole is a one-way door to oblivion. According to general
relativity, once anything crosses its boundary—the event horizon—it
cannot return to the outside. For that particle, the black hole is the
entire future.
We’ll never actually get a chance to see the
particle live out that destiny: Any light the particle emits (which
would be the only way for us to observe its death plunge) will be
stretched to longer and longer wavelengths with correspondingly less
energy, until it fades beyond detectability. In fact, the story is even
more strange. If we observe the particle falling in, we could never live
long enough to see it reach the event horizon. The extreme gravity of
the black hole makes time appear, to an outside observer, to go more slowly there;
in fact, the particle would seem to us to take infinite time to reach
the event horizon. That’s true even though from the particle’s reference
frame, it crosses the event horizon unremarkably, with no unusual
effects on time and space.
If a black hole is a one-way door to
oblivion, you might wonder if there is any way to go the other way
through the door—and it’s a good question. General relativity, which has
been our standard theory of gravity for nearly 100 years, makes no
distinction between past and future, time running forward and time
running backward. (See physicist Sean Carroll discuss the time-symmetry of physics in his interview with Nautilus.)
Newtonian physics also is time-symmetric in the same way. So the idea
of “white holes”—black holes reversed in time—does make theoretical
sense.
Like its opposite, a white hole has an event horizon,
one which cannot be crossed from the outside. But white holes’ event
horizons lie in the past: Particles originating there will appear to
“fade in,” with increasing energy and wavelength of any light they emit.
If a particle somehow came into existence inside that event horizon, it
would be expelled to the outside.
In fact, everything about
white holes just looks like black holes in reverse. General relativity
has absolutely no problem predicting such a thing and describing it
mathematically.
But do white holes exist in nature? And if they don’t, what does that say about the symmetry of time?
Seeing nothing vs seeing something
Black
holes are common in the cosmos—nearly every large galaxy harbors a
supermassive one in its nucleus, not to mention smaller specimens.
However, astronomers have yet to identify a single white hole. That
doesn’t rule out their existence entirely, since it might be hard to see
one: If they effectively repel particles, there’s a small possibility
they could be lurking out there somewhere, invisible. Nevertheless, none
of all the diverse objects astronomers have observed seem to resemble
what we’d expect from white holes.
An even larger problem
arises when we consider how white holes could form. Black holes are the
end result of gravitational collapse. When a star at least 20 times the
mass of the Sun exhausts its usable nuclear fuel, it can no longer
produce enough energy to balance the inward force of gravity. At that
point, the core collapses on itself, reaching ever higher densities
until its gravity is so intense that not even light can escape. That
results in a black hole with a mass comparable to a large star.
Supermassive
black holes, which are millions or billions of times heavier than that,
form by some currently unknown mechanism. In any case, they still are
the result of gravitational collapse, whether from a huge super-star
born in the early days of the Universe, a huge cloud of gas at the heart
of a primeval galaxy, or some other phenomenon. Forming a white hole,
however, would require something akin to a gravitational sewer
explosion, and it’s not clear how that sort of event could ever occur.
One possibility is that white holes might be “glued” to black holes. In
this view, a black hole and white hole are two sides of the same thing,
connected via a wormhole, a concept familiar from many science-fiction
stories. Unfortunately, as with forming white holes from scratch, this
doesn’t really solve the problem: According to theory, any matter
falling into the wormhole will cause it to collapse, closing the passage
between the black and white holes. (It’s also technically possible to
create a stable wormhole if “exotic matter” exists with negative
energy—a similar principle proposed for a “warp drive”—but no evidence for such material exists.)...MORE