Saturday, May 2, 2026

JPMorgan: "How tech became everything to everyone"

The writer, Kriti Gupta is Executive Director, Global Investment Strategist, J.P. Morgan Private Bank.

From JP Morgan Wealth Management, May 1:

When investors are excited about AI, they have bought tech. When they’re worried about inflation, they bought tech. When looking for outperformance, they bought tech. When thinking about sustainability, they bought tech. When they wanted to invest in growth, they bought tech. When they wanted to lean into the Capex cycle, they bought tech. When worried about the world and in need of a company with a cash cushion, they bought tech.

These are just some of the many reasons investors have leaned into tech, even in the face of lofty valuations. The sector has been perceived as the answer to everything and everyone. It’s a must-have portfolio allocation, both a cyclical and defensive trade and the driver of earnings growth. How did we get here?

Extraordinary earnings 
Ahead of the first quarter earnings season of 2026, the tech sector was expected to contribute nearly half of expected earnings growth. That’s more than triple the estimate for the S&P 500 as a whole. Supported by surging revenue growth, operating profit has soared, outpacing headcount additions, which in turn has fed margin expansion. In short, scale is working in their favor as the largest technology platforms continue to grow while keeping incremental costs contained.

At the turn of the century, technology stocks were purely a growth trade. The internet was coming and the world knew it. But earnings lagged the structural shift at play. Cue the dot-com bubble. Then, after the global financial crisis of 2008, they became something else: a duration trade. A low-interest-rate regime and growing liquidity on its balance sheet, thanks to post-COVID issuance at near-Treasury-level rates and extraordinary free cash flow, helped build their cash cushion. Cash holdings in the Magnificent Seven stocks – which now make up about 35% of the S&P 500 – grew over 300% between 2011 and 2025.

This stacked area chart shows the combined cash and short-term investments held by the seven largest tech companies — Microsoft, Google, Tesla, Nvidia, Apple, Meta, and Amazon — on a quarterly basis from 2011 through early 2026.

But even with – and perhaps because of – fortress balance sheets, technology stocks remain sensitive to changes in interest rates as their valuations hinge on cash flows far into the future. They are after all, still growth stocks. And yet, also a play on changing interest rates.

Durable earnings and cash buffers have made the sector resilient even if economic conditions weaken. It’s no longer a question of growth or even speedy growth. Quarter by quarter, the stocks are measured by whether they can beat high investor expectations. In other words, can the A+ student continue to get an A+ on its earnings report card?

And yet, they remain some of the most volatile stocks in the market. A normal range of movement in either direction for the seven biggest tech stocks is over 60% larger than that of the S&P 500. It’s rare for a single sector to embody so many different aspects at once.

Tech’s ‘Industrial Era’ 
For all its association with growth and the biggest players benefitting from defensive bids, tech is also deeply cyclical – whether it’s the short boom and bust cycles of semiconductors, ad spend associated with search engines and social media or subscription-based growth at the whim of business investment.

Now, with the innovation of artificial intelligence, it’s all about physical infrastructure while already being deeply embedded in the digital ecosystem and a core portfolio allocation.

At the helm of the AI wave, tech companies are driving a surge in capital expenditure – data centers, chips and energy infrastructure on a historic scale. This begins to resemble older industrial cycles, where growth depends less on asset-light scalability and more on the ability to deploy vast amounts of capital efficiently.

For decades, tech’s appeal has been high capital returns and minimal reinvestment needs. Now, it’s the opposite: pouring billions into physical infrastructure to sustain the next wave of growth....

....MUCH MORE