Oil: Two U.S. Shale Producers Say The Industry Can Live With $40 Oil

From City A.M.:

US shale gas industry sets sights on oil prices recovering to $40

Two of the largest US shale gas producers have said oil recovering to $40 per barrel will reverse the ailing industry’s fortunes.

Continental Resources could increase capital spending if US crude reaches low-to mid-$40s, allowing it to boost production by 10 per cent next year, chief financial officer John Hart said last week.

Whiting Petroleum also said oil at $40 to $45 would allow it to re-start activity on some of the wells its due to abandon next month, Reuters reported.

While the US shale gas industry has remained surprisingly resilient to low oil prices, the cracks are beginning to show. Last week, the two companies announced plans to halt fracking operations in Bakken, an area which has been one of the biggest drivers of the US shale gas boom.

Nevertheless, the comments by Continental Resources and Whiting suggest that the industry could bounce back more quickly than current expectations. Less than a year ago, major shale firms were saying they needed oil above $60 a barrel to produce more....MORE

"Economists React: China’s ‘Surprise’ Bank Reserve Cut "

From China Real Time:

The People’s Bank of China announced a 0.5 percentage point cut in the capital that bank are required to keep on reserve with the central bank, effective March 1. The measure to cut what is referred to as the RRR frees up an estimated $108 billion worth of funds. Still, the move surprised investors. In recent weeks, central bank officials signaled that they preferred to use open market operations and other targeted, short-term tools rather than relatively high-profile measures such as cutting interest rates or the reserve requirement, which risk weakening the yuan’s value. Here are some economists’ reactions to the latest move, edited for length and style.

China’s cut in required bank reserves underscores the growing tension that will be played out this year between economic restructuring and growth. The cut comes immediately after this weekend’s Group of 20 meeting in Shanghai in which G-20 members endorsed China’s more accommodative stance even as they urged Beijing not to devalue the yuan. This cut seems like it ticks off both of those boxes. –Tim Condon, ING Group

The central bank’s move to lower reserve requirement ratio is a surprise to the market after it injected trillions of yuan liquidity via open market operations. The PBOC previously indicated that it would avoid an RRR cut as it would put further downward pressure on the yuan. But now it went back to its traditional tool as some of these open market operations would mature this week. The easy solution for this is to cut the RRR, which can also help stabilize market expectations. –Larry Hu, Macquarie Capital Ltd.

The move underscores a message that officials have repeated in recent days, including at the G-20 meeting: policymakers still have room to support the economy. This move suggests there is still a bias towards supporting the economy. Also, the explicit mention in the statement of supporting credit growth is significant. For now, the emphasis is on shoring up growth in the near term. Finally, today’s move suggests that the PBOC is more relaxed about capital outflows than a few weeks ago.  –Mark Williams, Capital Economics

...MORE 

"LinkedIn: Looking for Its Next Gig?" (LNKD)

Lifted in toto from Beyond Search:

I signed up for the free LinkedIn years ago. I don’t do too much LinkedIn surfing. I do delete the email I get from the company. I had one of the goslings post a list of my articles to see what would happen. (Results of the test: Nothing happened.) I find it amusing that marketers and PR “professionals” want to be my LinkedIn contact. I used to write these folks and ask, “Why do you want to be my LinkedIn friend?” (Results of the test: No one writes back.) Now you know why I don’t do much LinkedIn surfing. No, I don’t read the musings of the firm’s “thought leaders.”

I did read “LinkedIn Problems Run Deeper Than Valuation.” The write up informed me of this interesting “assertion”:

The problem stems from each of the company’s revenue streams, which ultimately diminish the business value of using the service. Whether it’s being paid to promote content, focusing on sales and recruitment over other professions, or interruptive advertising, these streams incentivize poor behavior by individual users on the site.

I like that “poor behavior” and the incentive angle. The concrete foundation of LinkedIn, it seems to me, is spam.

The company, according to the write up, has a reason to face each day with a big smile:

The company still has assets that are the envy of any tech company — a vast user base and a wealth of content to exploit.

As Yahoo’s publishing experiment demonstrates, content may not be enough.

I think the larger issue is the fact that social networks often lose their stickiness after a period of time. Google’s social efforts seem to mirror the challenges of MySpace. LinkedIn may find itself trapped by its own job hunting system choked with marketers’ leading thoughts.

Why not drive for Uber, Lyft, or Amazon? Less spam and probably a shorter path to some real cash. By the way, did you ever try to locate something using the company’s search engine? Quite a piece of work is that.

Stephen E Arnold, February 29, 2016

Speaking of which, I forgot to note that last week Dilbert's Asok had given notice to the pointy-headed boss:

Byron Wein: There Won't Be A Bear Market

Our model (best guess) says no recession but is iffy on a 20% drawdown in equities. The S&P 500's undercutting of the August lows in both January and February gives one pause. Plus there's that Feb. gap that didn't get filled.

On the other hand, Wein is a very smart guy who's been at the market a very long time, i.e. Blackstone doesn't keep him around for his dashing good looks.

FinViz

That all-time high on the S&P was 2134.72 so a 20% haircut is 1707.77.

From Barron's Wall Street's Best Minds column:

The Blackstone strategist writes that stocks will benefit from oversold conditions. But he’s no raging bull.

While I began this year with a cautious view of the financial markets, I did not expect the swift market declines that we have all experienced. At one point, the Standard & Poor’s 500 was down 10% year-to-date. The recent weakness is clearly supported by some serious economic problems which I will explore. My conclusion, however, is that we will not endure either a bear market or a recession this year, and I will try to defend that position in the course of this essay. 

In the current investment environment, it is easy to give up hope. Stock markets around the world have fallen sharply since the beginning of the year because of many factors. Monetary accommodations by central banks almost everywhere have done little to boost economies or arrest the plunge in equities. Investors are so anxious to hide from risk assets that they have pushed yields in developed markets down to extremely low levels or even negative rates. Designed to encourage consumer spending and bank lending, negative rates have some positive effect in the short term, but the long-term benefits are not clear. While the data on the performance of U.S. and European economies indicate that modest growth is continuing, the fear is that turbulence in the financial markets will cause businesses and individuals to curb their spending and a global recession will begin later this year. The fact that manufacturing is already in a recession in key areas raises the question of whether other sectors of the world’s economies are strong enough to keep even slow growth alive.

Perhaps it all started with China. While official numbers reported suggest strong growth is continuing, almost every observer believes that a slowdown of some significance is taking place there. The negative view is supported by data on exports, imports of raw materials, electricity consumption, retail sales and capital spending. 

The good news is that the Chinese economy is rebalancing. Growth was too dependent on capital expenditures for state-owned enterprises and infrastructure. Debt incurred to fund those projects had increased to unsustainable levels and there was concern that the banks held many non-performing loans. The economy could not continue to move forward on that basis; consumer spending had to overtake capital spending as it has in most western economies.

This process is underway, but during the transition period and perhaps beyond, growth will slow. An expectation that the second largest economy in the world will continue to grow at seven percent is unrealistic; four to five percent is more realistic. China’s growth is critical. When it was growing at seven percent, it accounted for 25% of the increase in world GDP. China is still creating more than ten million jobs annually, bringing people out of the agricultural countryside and into challenging but more financially rewarding urban settings. Its current leader, Xi Jinping, is determined to purge corruption from the leadership ranks. The Chinese population is supportive of the current regime and that is an important positive. If the fiscal and monetary stimulus program falls short, a devaluation of the currency may be used to stimulate exports. Many, including myself, expect that to happen later this year, but lately the authorities have been using China’s considerable foreign currency reserves to prop up the yuan. This effort caused the yuan to rally sharply in February and, as a result, China’s $3 trillion plus in reserves is being drawn down $100 billion a month.

The decline in the price of oil may be the major factor causing the current financial market volatility. Initially, lower oil prices were viewed as an economic positive. Consumers would have more money to spend, retail sales would improve and real growth in developed economies that import oil would increase. As it turned out, only half of the money saved at the pump was spent elsewhere; consumers paid down debt with, or banked, the other half. The more worrisome aspect of the decline in the price of oil was its impact on capital spending and the credit markets. The rig count dropped by 70% and the bonds of marginal exploration and development companies collapsed. This raised questions about the financial condition of some of the major lenders to the energy industry, causing financial stocks everywhere to suffer declines. In Germany, Deutsche Bank stepped in to buy $5.4 billion of its bonds to prove its financial condition was “rock solid.” Still, investors expected some of the major established energy companies to cut their dividends....MORE

(More) "On The $100 Bill"

From This Is Ashok:

Larry Summers and others have recently argued that high-denomination notes (HDNs) make it easier to transact crime, finance terrorism, and evade taxes. The conclusion seems to be that removing the $100 from circulation could have a lot of potential upside without much downside. The argument derives largely from a paper describing the many ways in which HDNs promote illicit activity.

The WSJ claim that removing the $100 bill is a threat to free enterprise is, of course, nonsense. However, while the specific facts supporting the case are convincing, the conclusion itself may be unwarranted without further addressing the following questions.

• The Sands paper notes that 25 to 70% of $100 bills are held abroad. Even assuming that 100% of the lower bound is used in strictly illicit activity, that leaves $750 billion in clean hands. If the premise of the argument is that HDNs make crime easy – and that criminals pay a premium on the order of 5-10% for this subsidy – then existing $100 bills will float towards criminals. Ending future issuance of this note (I assume this is not a mandatory exchange as Summers writes about “ending the further issuance”) doesn’t seem likely to rival the natural market equilibrium as benign users let their notes fall in criminal hands. Sure the premium paid might go up, but there is a large stock pile, so to speak. 
• In 2016 the Fed plans to print $150 million worth of $100 bills, or in other words ending future issuance for the next 2000-5000 years would balance the non-foreign / criminal portion of the $100 held (depending on your estimates). Now if only criminals benefit from the convenience, the remaining balance would easily float over with little extra cost. If this isn’t the case it means the innocent users of $100 benefit from its convenience somehow – a market-based claim that can’t be ignored by simply stipulating otherwise.
• There is an information tradeoff. Imagine if criminals transacted only in $10,000 notes. It would be reasonably easy for intelligence agencies to sneak a traceable note to probe criminal networks. This would be close to impossible with a $20 note (not the least because this is a high velocity note used by normal people).
• Citing the high use of $100 among criminals doesn’t mean much. Of course criminals use the lightest / most compact / highest denomination currency at their disposal. Therefore suggestions along the lines of “n% of criminal activity is transacted in $100 bills” mean little because if we got rid of the $100 and managed to avoid the problems noted in point (1) it would be the case that “n% of criminal activity is transacted in $20 bills”.

• Consider the proposed premiums for $100 bills. For one, if the numbers were this high it further emphasizes the point made in (1). But importantly, they seem a little too large to be only about the denomination. There is a large liquidity premium. (I bet criminal FX markets in Argentina don’t have much in the $1 note inventory). People transacting in smaller notes – like innocent Argentinians avoiding a tyrannical government – are unlikely the balance, “marginal”, consumers of dollar bills. Furthermore, given that transaction with a criminal is likely more heavily penalized than transaction with a bystander, this implicit tax is built into the premium. I have a hard time believing $100 is 10% cheaper due only to transportation and convenience....

...MORE

"The Quantum Secret to Superconductivity"

Serious science.

From Quanta Magazine:

In a virtuoso experiment, physicists have revealed details of a “quantum critical point” that underlies high-temperature superconductivity.

The 90-tesla magnet system at the National Laboratory for Intense Magnetic Fields in Toulouse, France.

The energy equivalent of several kilograms of TNT surged into the coil, bathing the 0.003-carat crystal in its bore in one of the strongest magnetic fields ever generated. 

From the magnet came a small boom like the sound of a foot stomping, said engineer Jérôme Béard — but thankfully, no explosion. His calculations held up.

With that magnetic blast and a subsequent series of identical ones executed last winter, researchers at the National Laboratory for Intense Magnetic Fields (LNCMI) in Toulouse, France, uncovered a key property of the crystal, a matte-black ceramic in a class of materials called cuprates that are the most potent superconductors known. The findings, reported today in the journal Nature, provide a major clue about the inner workings of cuprates, and may help scientists understand how these materials allow electricity to flow freely at relatively high temperatures.

“Technically amazing,” said J.C. Séamus Davis, an experimental physicist with appointments at Cornell University, St. Andrews University in Scotland, and Brookhaven National Laboratory who was not involved in the experiment. “The paper is a masterpiece.”

The experimental team, led by LNCMI staff scientist Cyril Proust and Louis Taillefer of the University of Sherbrooke in Canada, used their 90-tesla magnet — which creates a magnetic field nearly two million times as strong as the one enshrouding Earth — to momentarily strip away superconductivity in their cuprate sample. This revealed details of the underlying phase from which the behavior seems to arise.

With the veil lifted, the scientists discovered a sharp change in behavior at what appears to be a “quantum critical point” in cuprates, reminiscent of the freezing point of water. Theorists have long speculated that such a quantum critical point might exist, and that it could play a key role in superconductivity, said Andrey Chubukov, a condensed-matter theorist at the University of Minnesota. “One thing is to say this; another thing is to measure it,” Chubukov said.

Superconductivity is a phenomenon in which electricity flows without resistance from the material it moves through, so that no energy is lost in the process. It occurs when electrons (the negatively charged carriers of electricity) unite to form pairs, balancing each other’s properties in a way that allows them all to move in unison. The phase in which this happens is delicate, typically occurring only when a material is cooled to rock-bottom temperatures. But if wires could be engineered to act as superconductors at room temperature, experts say the lossless electrical transmission would greatly reduce global energy usage and usher in a host of new technologies, such as magnetically levitating vehicles and cheap water-purification systems. 

The force driving superconductivity is strongest in cuprates. As IBM researchers Georg Bednorz and K. Alexander Müller discovered in 1986 (in work that earned them Nobel Prizes the following year), cuprates superconduct at much higher temperatures than other materials, suggesting that their electrons are paired by a different and stronger glue. But cuprates must still be cooled below minus 100 degrees Celsius before they become superconductive. The glue must be further strengthened if superconductors’ operating temperatures are to be dialed up. For 30 years scientists have asked: What is the glue — or, more precisely, the quantum mechanical interaction between electrons — that causes superconductivity to arise in cuprates?...MUCH MORE

How Cliff Asness' AQR Liquid Alternative Funds Are Outperforming Competitors

One of the quantfathers.
From Barron's cover:

Cliff Asness’ approach has helped make AQR’s liquid-alt mutual funds among the best in the business.

Since U.S. stocks peaked in July, few investments have produced strong returns. Global stocks, junk bonds, and most commodities have declined—in many cases, sharply. And many so-called alternative investments have failed to provide hoped-for diversification benefits. Just look at the big losses suffered by some notable hedge funds.

The situation hasn’t been much better among liquid alternatives, or mutual funds that use hedge fund strategies such as merger and convertible arbitrage, long/short equity, and trend-following in futures markets. Yet, against this tough backdrop, a bunch of academics are delivering. Their firm, AQR Capital Management (AQR stands for applied quantitative research), is a distinctive investment manager with $141 billion in assets that seeks to translate academic insights about finance and the markets—such as the appeal of value and momentum investing—into winning quantitative strategies for institutional and retail buyers.

Nearly all of AQR’s liquid-alt mutual funds are in the black since late July, including the industry’s largest fund, the $11 billion AQR Managed Futures Strategy (ticker: AQMIX), which is up 7% through mid-February, against an 11% drop in the Standard & Poor’s 500 and a 16% decline in the MSCI World index over the same period (see chart, below). “This has been one of the periodic reminders of the benefits of diversification. There has been a view since the market bottom in 2009 that all you needed was the S&P 500 index,” says David Kabiller, a founding principal of the 18-year-old firm, based in Greenwich, Conn. The other two founding principals are Cliff Asness and John Liew.

 

Indeed, the stock market selloff since the start of this year has shaped up as a key test of whether liquid alts can deliver the promised diversification and protect investors during downturns. Liquid-alt funds have been rightly criticized for generally disappointing returns during the recent bull market—and high fees, to boot.

The performance of AQR’s liquid-alt funds has been good so far this year, with most in the black and besting many big rival funds (see nearby table). “What has happened this year is a nice data point that we are doing what we say,” says Asness. “I’m proud of what we’ve done, but I want to be intellectually honest. One data point doesn’t prove a concept, and I look forward to proving it many more times.” 

AQR’s staff of more than 600 boasts 52 Ph.Ds, including Asness, who was Eugene Fama’s student and teaching assistant at the University of Chicago. Fama, a Nobel laureate and former student of Milton Friedman, is known as the father of efficient-markets theory. The AQR academics would stack up well against the finance faculty at major universities. This brainpower is harnessed to develop and execute quantitative strategies that can generate market-beating returns. “You would be surprised how much effort it takes to turn the academic into the practical. Making money for clients involves controlling costs, managing risk, and building real portfolios. Academic work is just the tip of the iceberg,” says Liew. 

AQR is the largest manager in the fragmented, growing, and controversial liquid-alt market. The firm had $17 billion in liquid-alt assets, plus a smattering of long-only strategies, with total fund assets of $23 billion at year-end 2015. It is the liquid-alt industry’s biggest grower, with $7 billion of inflows since the start of 2015. The industry totals $170 billion, excluding go-anywhere, unconstrained bond funds.

“AQR is the clear leader in delivering alternative strategies to retail investors,” says Morningstar analyst Jason Kephart. “It has developed strategies that move to their own beat and fulfill the promise of delivering uncorrelated returns that will diversify a traditional portfolio.” 

Affiliated Managers Group (AMG), which holds stakes in more than 30 investment managers, including Harding Loevner and Yacktman Asset Management, owns an undisclosed minority interest in AQR. The firm is among the largest and most successful managers in AMG’s portfolio....MUCH MORE

The Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report And Warren's Letter To Shareholders Are Now Available (BRK.a)

Report

and 

Letter

We'll be back with some some commentary later today.
Until then, MoneyBeat is LiveBlogging® the report which sort of funny when you think about it.

Emerging Markets Are The Trade Of The Decade--Pimco Adviser Research Affiliates

This is the first time we have posted positively on emerging markets. For the last many years when we've posted on the EM's we'd include this bit as part of our boilerplate intro:

"Energing market speculation tends to appear at a juncture in the economic cycle when 

declining yields on domestic bonds combine with an excess of capital to make 

foreign investments particularly attractive."

-Edward Chancellor

Devil take the Hindmost: A History of Financial Speculation

Chapter 4, Fool's Gold: The Emerging Markets of the 1820's

From Bloomberg:

Emerging-market assets are so cheap that they may be “the trade of a decade,” according to Research Affiliates LLC, a sub-adviser to Pacific Investment Management Co., one of the world’s biggest money managers.

They’re joining a growing number of investors, including BlackRock Inc., Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs Asset Management, who are turning bullish on emerging markets after three years of underperformance. With borrowing costs at the highest levels since the depths of the global financial crisis, bond investors are being compensated for challenges ranging from falling commodity prices to China’s economic slowdown, BlackRock said Tuesday.

(click to enlarge)

“The exodus from emerging markets is a wonderful opportunity -- and quite possibly the trade of a decade -- for the long-term investor,” Christopher Brightman, chief investment officer at Research Affiliates, said in a post on Pimco’s website Wednesday. “We are increasingly confident of our positioning in emerging market stocks and bonds.”

‘Exceptionally Cheap’
Developing-market securities accounted for 35 percent of the Pimco All Asset Fund and 39 percent of the Pimco All Asset All Authority as of Dec. 31, according to Brightman, who is based in Newport Beach, California. The two funds, managed by Rob Arnott who co-founded Research Affiliates in 2002, had combined assets of about $29 billion at the end of January, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Brightman said emerging-market stocks are “exceptionally cheap” after MSCI Inc.’s benchmark gauge declined 30 percent over the past three years.

He pointed out that the so-called Shiller P/E Ratio, a measure of valuation based on cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, fell to 10 in January. There have been only six times when the measure has dipped below 10 over the past 25 years. In the following five years, the stocks rallied an average 188 percent, according to Brightman, who oversaw the endowment at the University of Virginia before joining Arnott’s Research Affiliates....MORE

Venture Capital: "Morgan Stanley Marks Down Its Stake In Palantir, Dropbox"

Marking down Palantir, one of the extremely rare (former) Double Decacorns is a big deal.
From Fortune:

Another sign of a cooling market for high-flying startups.

A Morgan Stanley mutual fund has marked down the value of its shares in high-profile data crunching company Palantir by 32%, highlighting the darkening cloud over many of Silicon Valley’s billion dollar startups.

The lowered share valuation, first reported by technology news site The Information, comes as technology companies face increased investor skepticism. Even elite startups like Palantir, valued at nearly $20 billion in its latest funding round in July, are being caught in the recent turbulence.
Morgan Stanley’s Institutional Fund Trust Mid Cap Growth Portfolio mutual fund, whose stake in Palantir is now worth $45 million, disclosed in a filing that it had reduced the value it assigned to Palantir’s shares to $7.70 as of December compared to $11.38 at the company’s most recent fundraising round.

Morgan Stanley’s fund invested in Palantir, a part of a group of highly valued tech startups known as unicorns, in 2012 and 2013....MORE

This follows on news reported last week that someone was posting flyers around Palantir HQ that said employee stock was worthless. Here's Fortune again, this time from Feb. 24:

Dead Unicorns Are Warning Silicon Valley Workers

There will be blood (and tears.)

For Silicon Valley’s “unicorns,” the writing is on the wall—literally, flyers warning of their plummeting values are appearing on walls.

On Wednesday, Quartz reporter David Yanofsky spotted paper flyers taped around Palo Alto’s University Avenue, a major artery of tech offices in the city, warning Palantir employees’ of their worthless company shares. Along with stern statements about shares of Palantir’s common stock, which are worth $0, according to the flyer’s author, is a slain unicorn, bleeding rainbow colors.

“Go on a strike or take over the company. Just don’t let your founders and investors screw you over,” read the flyers, in capital letters.

 

"startup employee rights"https://t.co/E6N0M1peYK pic.twitter.com/p1hlFBFZ2q

— David Yanofsky (@YAN0) February 24, 2016

Founded in 2004, Palantir is a venture capital-funded company that provides data analysis software, and whose clients include U.S. government agencies. In December, it closed a $880 million mega-round of funding, and it’s currently valued at $20 billion. Palantir co-founder and CEO Alex Karp has also publicly voiced the company’s desire to remain private, likely another reason for the flyers’ alarm about the company’s employee stock....MORE

Chartology: Crude Oil

WTI $33.30 up 23 cents after trading as high as $34.69.
The spike on Jan. 28 got to $34.82, so today was close, but not quite a new high on this go-round.
From Stockcharts:

Crude Oil Update

In the blog post of December 17th titled ‘Crude Oil; How Low Can it Go?’ (click here for a link), we studied the bear market in crude oil of 2008-09, the bull market of 2009, and then the current bear market. The long term point and figure analysis for each of these periods has been very accurate and useful. The 2013-14 top generated a count that carried from $112 to a target range of $28 to $34 which was hard to believe at the time. $WTIC has since melted all the way down to the $27 (lowest PnF box) level before bouncing to $34 for a near direct hit of the PnF count objectives. Have we seen the low for crude oil? Is it time to buy crude oil? What should we expect next? 

What has transpired since the prior post is really interesting and a good review of some essential Wyckoffian principles. Where our prior analysis was employing weekly vertical charts and 3-box reversal PnF, here we will zoom in with shorter term charts for a more detailed view. With crude on a glide path for a potential landing, shorter term data can inform how that landing will occur and if there will be a touchdown or a continuation of the decline....

...MORE

See also Feb. 23's "Oil Chartology: Been There, Done That".

SunEdison Has Doubled In Under 48 Hours (SUNE)

$1.26 at the close on Wednesday, $2.53 last.
Here's the last 10 months action via FinViz:

The double is over there on the right.
Here's the latest, from Bloomberg: 

SunEdison, Vivint Surge as Judge Clears Path for Acquisition

SunEdison Inc., the world’s biggest clean-energy developer, rallied the most in 14 years after a judge in Delaware rejected a plea to block a portion of its $1.9 billion acquisition of Vivint Solar Inc.
SunEdison gained 35 percent to $2.32 at 10:09 a.m. in New York, after earlier surging as much as 61 percent, the most intraday since October 2001. Vivint rose as much as 38 percent, the biggest gain since the acquisition was announced in July.

The news dragged down shares of TerraForm Power Inc., the yieldco unit formed by SunEdison to buy and operate power plants. As part of the complicated deal, TerraForm has agreed to pay $799 million to acquire some of Vivint’s assets. That’s the component of the transaction that was contested in the Delaware case. TerraForm slipped as much as 6.7 percent.

The ruling will let SunEdison move forward with the Vivint deal, a transaction that’s been under scrutiny from shareholders and investors. SunEdison shares have plunged more than 90 percent since announcing plans to buy Vivint and expand into the residential solar market. The terms were renegotiated in December and SunEdison has said it wants to close the deal this quarter....MORE

Good grief, it reads like a press release from an '80's Vancouver deal.
There are higher quality ways to get exposure to the solars should one so desire.

Natural Gas: EIA Weekly Supply/Demand Report

Front futures: $1.765 down 2.0 cents after touching $1.761 and looking weak.
The last couple weeks action:

FinViz

From the Energy Information Administration:

In the News:

Cheniere’s Sabine Pass ships first LNG cargo from the U.S. Lower 48
Sabine Pass, the first liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal to be constructed in the Lower 48 states, shipped its first cargo of domestically sourced natural gas on Wednesday. The LNG is being carried aboard the LNG tanker Asia Vision to Brazil's TRBA (Bahia) offshore terminal. Sabine Pass is expected to load several commissioning cargos as part of its start-up process, after which it will need the approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to operate commercially. Previously, the United States has only been exporting LNG from Alaska and occasionally re-exporting LNG from the import terminals in the Lower 48 states.

Sabine Pass, located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, has completed construction of the first two of its six liquefaction trains, each with a capacity to liquefy 0.55 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of natural gas. Commissioning of the first liquefaction train began in the fall of 2015, but several mechanical issues delayed the start-up. Three other trains at Sabine Pass are currently under construction and are scheduled to come online in 2017-19, while the sixth train is waiting for a final investment decision.

Six other liquefaction projects are scheduled to come online this year in Australia, Malaysia, and Indonesia. They will add approximately 8% to the total global liquefaction capacity, while the two trains at Sabine Pass will add 2% to the total.

The five LNG export facilities currently under construction in the United States, including Sabine Pass, will have a total liquefaction capacity of 9.2 Bcf/d, which is equivalent to 13% of current domestic natural gas production. Nearly all of this capacity has been fully or partially contracted and is scheduled to be in service by 2019. Once all facilities under construction become operational, the United States will become the third-largest liquefaction capacity holder in the world after Australia and Qatar....MORE 

Prices/Demand/Supply:
Natural gas prices decline. Prices began the week at low levels and declined further at most locations across the country as weather was mild and consumption was relatively low. The Henry Hub spot price fell from $1.91/MMBtu last Wednesday to $1.79/MMBtu yesterday, February 24. Declines were similar at other major market locations. At the Chicago Citygate, the spot price fell from $1.91 /MMBtu last Wednesday to $1.80/MMBtu yesterday. At the SoCal Citygate, prices fell from $1.91/MMBtu last week to $1.87/MMBtu yesterday.

Northeast prices decline. Prices in the Boston area declined substantially this week on warmer temperatures. At the Algonquin Citygate, which serves Boston, prices fell from $4.18/MMBtu at the beginning of the report week to $1.70/MMBtu yesterday. At Transcontinental Pipeline’s Zone 6 trading point serving New York City, prices began the week at $2.12/MMBtu, and ended the week at $1.78/MMBtu. Transco’s Zone 6 non-New York trading point, which serves Pennsylvania and New Jersey consumers, began the report week at $2.03/MMBtu and settled yesterday at $1.74/MMBtu.

Marcellus prices fall. At Dominion South in northwest Pennsylvania, prices began at $1.53/MMBtu last Wednesday and ended the report week at $1.36/MMBtu yesterday. On Transco's Leidy Line in northern Pennsylvania, prices remained flat, beginning and ending the report week at $1.32/MMBtu.

Nymex prices fall. The price of the Nymex March 2016 contract fell this week from $1.942/MMBtu last Wednesday to $1.778/MMBtu yesterday. The price of the 12-month strip (the 12 contracts between March 2016 and February 2017) fell from $2.299/MMBtu last Wednesday to $2.144/MMBtu yesterday. Earlier today, on the final day of trading for the March contract, the price settled at $1.711.

Production falls slightly. Dry natural gas production fell 0.2% from the previous week, but remained 2.9% greater than the same time last year. U.S. imports of natural gas from Canada declined by 24.4%. Pipeline imports to the Northeast, Midwest, and West all declined substantially. LNG sendout also declined from the previous week.

Consumption declines. Warmer-than-normal weather led to a 19.7% decline in U.S. consumption. The large decline was driven by a 34.0% decrease in residential/commercial consumption, but consumption declined in all sectors. Consumption of natural gas for electric power generation fell by 5.9%, and industrial consumption fell by 7.1%. U.S. exports of natural gas to Mexico fell by 1.2%, but were 38.5% greater than the same week a year ago....MORE

Hey, There's A New Disclosure At Larry Summers' Financial Times Blog!

Yesterday's post on getting rid of large denomination currency, "In defence of killing the $100 bill" begins with:

This post is written by Peter Sands and Larry Summers
Our advocacy of ending the printing of high denomination notes — first in a working paper by Peter and colleagues and, later in a post by Larry — has been attacked on the ground that this proposal represents an infringement on liberty (for example, see here and here). Most prominently, the Wall Street Journal concludes an editorial with the remarkable assertion “Beware politicians trying to limit the way you can conduct private economic business. It never turns out well.”...

And ends with:

Peter Sands is a Senior Fellow at the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government at the Harvard Kennedy School and the former Chief Executive Officer at Standard Chartered Bank.

Lawrence Summers is a professor at and past president of Harvard University. He was treasury secretary from 1999 to 2001 and an economic adviser to President Obama from 2009 through 2010. He serves as an advisor or board member to a number of financial technology and payments companies.

That last bit about the fintech companies and the payments companies does not appear in Mr. Summers' Feb. 16 blog post "It’s time to go after big money" which addresses the same topic:

An important paper making a compelling case for stopping the issuance of high denomination notes like the €500 note and $100 bill, or even withdrawing them from circulation, has just been issued by Peter Sands and a group of students at Harvard’s Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government (which I direct)....

Huh.

USDA Chief Economist Makes A Case For Farmland

It's too early.
Even though we think we'll see some upward price pressure come late summer, after a meandering downtrend, the reality of farmland investment is that it is only worth a multiple of the cash flow.
(unless you're on the edge of a metro area and have some non-public zoning info)

From Agrimoney:

Top economist makes case for steady land prices, despite ag downturn

Pressure on US land values may stay constrained despite the losses many growers face, one of the country's top ag economists said, noting the extent of farmers' reserves left over from more prosperous times.

Robert Johansson, chief economist at the US Department of Agriculture, flagged the extent to which land prices had soared during more prosperous times for agriculture.

"When US farm income boomed, land values rose as well," Dr Johansson said, citing annual growth rates which reached 20% earlier in the decade.

However, he did not suggest that the sharp decline in agricultural income of late would prompt an equally rapid reversal.

Rental measure

Certainly, recent data from the Federal Reserve on land values in key Plains and Midwest states "show that land values might have hit a plateau", Dr Johansson told the USDA's Outlook forum.

"In general, farmland values in the region have been weakening lately."

However, judged by cash rents – and calculating a value from capitalising this revenue stream – current land prices "could make sense in some regions.

"The present value of the income stream remains above the average land value in the Corn Belt,"

Running at a loss

This was the case even if making an allowance for higher interest rates, or an easing in rents - which appears possible, given the weaker profitability prospects farmers face....MORE

Corn      360-6 up 0-2
Wheat    455-9 up 1-0

Saudi Diplomatic Cable: "Overthrow the Syrian Regime, but Play Nice with Russia"--WikiLeaks

From the Levant Report:

IT IS NO SECRET that Saudi Arabia, along with its Gulf and Western allies, has played a direct role in fueling the fires of grinding sectarian conflict that has kept Syria burning for the past five years. It is also no secret that Russian intervention has radically altered the kingdom’s “regime change” calculus in effect since at least 2011. But an internal Saudi government cable sheds new light on the kingdom’s current threats of military escalation in Syria.

Overthrow the Regime “by all means available”
A WikiLeaks cable released as part of “The Saudi Cables” in the summer of 2015, now fully translated here for the first time, reveals what the Saudis feared most in the early years of the war: Russian military intervention and Syrian retaliation. These fears were such that the kingdom directed its media “not to oppose Russian figures and to avoid insulting them” at the time.
Saudi Arabia had further miscalculated that the “Russian position” of preserving the Assad government “will not persist in force.” In Saudi thinking, reflected in the leaked memo, Assad’s violent ouster (“by all means available”) could be pursued so long as Russia stayed on the sidelines. The following section is categorical in its emphasis on regime change at all costs, even should the U.S. vacillate for “lack of desire”:

The fact must be stressed that in the case where the Syrian regime is able to pass through its current crisis in any shape or form, the primary goal that it will pursue is taking revenge on the countries that stood against it, with the Kingdom and some of the countries of the Gulf coming at the top of the list. If we take into account the extent of this regime’s brutality and viciousness and its lack of hesitancy to resort to any means to realize its aims, then the situation will reach a high degree of danger for the Kingdom, which must seek by all means available and all possible ways to overthrow the current regime in Syria. As regards the international position, it is clear that there is a lack of “desire” and not a lack of “capability” on the part of Western countries, chief among them the United States, to take firm steps…

Amman-based Albawaba News—one of the largest online news providers in the Middle East—was the first to call attention to the WikiLeaks memo, which “reveals Saudi officials saying President Bashar al-Assad must be taken down before he exacts revenge on Saudi Arabia.” Albawaba offered a brief partial translation of the cable, which though undated, was likely produced in early 2012 (based on my best speculation using event references in the text; Russia began proposing informal Syrian peace talks in January 2012).

Russian Hardware, a Saudi Nightmare
Over the past weeks Saudi Arabia has ratcheted up its rhetoric on Syria, threatening direct military escalation and the insertion of special forces on the ground, ostensibly for humanitarian and stabilizing purposes as a willing partner in the “war on terror.” As many pundits are now observing, in reality the kingdom’s saber rattling stems not from confidence, but utter desperation as its proxy anti-Assad fighters face defeat by overwhelming Russian air power and Syrian ground forces, and as the Saudi military itself is increasingly bogged down in Yemen....MORE

"In a surprise win for humanity, Mercedes Benz has announced that it's ditching the robots...

...used on its assembly line in favor of human workers because they can cope with the job better."

From The Register:

Humans 1 robots 0 as Mercedes deautomates production lines

"Robots can't deal with the degree of individualization and the many variants that we have today," Markus Schaefer, the luxury car-maker's head of production told Bloomberg. "We're saving money and safeguarding our future by employing more people."

The robot marching papers are being handed out at the firm's largest manufacturing plant in Sindelfingen, Germany, which churns out 400,000 cars a year. In line with other auto-makers, the firm has diversified its car lineup to provide many different options, and the machines can't cope with the choices available.

"The variety is too much to take on for the machines," Schaefer said. "They can't work with all the different options and keep pace with changes."

The firm plans to add 30 new models to its lineup over the next four years, and that means a lot of customization in the manufacturing process. All of these will also have individual features picked by the buyer – from in-car technology to the color of the seats, and this is best done by human builders, he said.

The production line won't be entirely robot-free, Schaefer explained, but instead, humans will work side by side with smaller robots that can handle the main repetitive tasks while German workers do the tricky stuff. As an added bonus, paid workers can buy cars, further driving demand....MORE

And In Great First Lines:

"A former meerkat expert at London Zoo was cleared Tuesday of assaulting a monkey handler in a love spat over a llama-keeper."

-AP's The Big Story, February 23, 2016

Of course.

Let the record show: The llama-wrangler is not all that.

Oil: Here Come the Defaults

From Bloomberg: 

Biggest Wave Yet of U.S. Oil Defaults Looms as Bust Intensifies
In less than a month, the U.S. oil bust could claim two of its biggest victims yet.

Energy XXI Ltd. and SandRidge Energy Inc., oil and gas drillers with a combined $7.6 billion of debt, didn’t pay interest on their bonds last week. They have until the middle of next month to either pay the interest, work out a deal with their creditors or face a default that could tip them into bankruptcy.

If the two companies fail in March, it would be the biggest cluster of oil and gas defaults in a month since energy prices plunged in early 2015.

“We’re just beginning to see how bad 2016 is going to be,” said Becky Roof, managing director for turnaround and restructuring with consulting firm AlixPartners.

Debt-Fueled Boom
The U.S. shale boom was fueled by junk debt. Companies spent more on drilling than they earned selling oil and gas, plugging the difference with other peoples’ money. Drillers piled up a staggering $237 billion of borrowings at the end of September, according to data compiled on the 61 companies in the Bloomberg Intelligence index of North American independent oil and gas producers. U.S. crude production soared to its highest in more than three decades.

Oil prices have now fallen more than 70 percent from a 2014 peak, and banks and bondholders are fighting for scraps. Bond prices reflect investors’ fears. U.S. high yield energy debt lost 24 percent last year, the biggest fall since 2008, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Indexes. Investors are now demanding a yield of 19.6 percent to hold U.S. junk-rated energy bonds, after borrowing costs for these companies exceeded 20 percent for the first time ever this month, according to data compiled by Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Both Energy XXI and SandRidge could still reach an agreement with creditors that will give them time to turn their businesses around. SandRidge said last week that it missed a $21.7 million interest payment. The company owes $4.2 billion, including a fully-drawn $500 million credit line. Energy XXI, which owes $3.4 billion, said in a filing last week that it missed an $8.8 million interest payment.

David Kimmel, a spokesman for SandRidge, said it has the money to make interest payments due in February, March and April. He wouldn’t comment on SandRidge’s options if it doesn’t make the interest payments by the end of the grace period. David Griffith, investor relations associate with Energy XXI, did not respond to an e-mail seeking comment.

Now What?
The companies’ failing to pay interest on their bonds may be a way to help motivate creditors to renegotiate debt, said Jason Wangler, an energy analyst with Wunderlich Securities in Houston.

“It’s a negotiating tool,” Wangler said. “They say, ‘I’m not going to pay you. Now what are you going to do?’”...MORE

I know, I know!
I think the answer is:

"We're going to take away all the assets, shop for a prosecutor to charge you criminally and sue you civilly for common, wire and securities fraud".
"Then we'll see if we can pierce the corporate veil to go after you personally."
"After the foreplay, we're going to..."

Is that the correct answer?

Natural Gas: December Lows Tested Following Lean Storage Draw

Platts' analyst survey had the pull at 144-148 Bcf, that's a pretty big miss.
April futures $1.764 down 7.0 cents after trading as low as 1.747. Here's the 5-minute chart from FinViz:

From Natural Gas Intelligence:

Natural gas futures plunged Thursday morning after the Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported a storage withdrawal that was much less than the market had expected.

EIA reported a 117 Bcf withdrawal in its 10:30 a.m. EST release, and the market immediately tested December lows at $1.684.

The EIA also revised last week's withdrawal from 158 Bcf to 163 Bcf, thus imparting a touch of bullishness to an otherwise highly bearish report. The expiring March futures contract fell to a low of $1.683 following the release of the storage data, and by 10:45 a.m. March was trading at $1.686, down 9.2 cents from Wednesday's settlement.

"I think a little bit of money was taken off the table on the dip, but otherwise the shorts are very comfortable right now," a New York floor trader told NGI. "The drop put prices below the previous support in the low $1.70s and is exactly what the shorts were looking for. We may test $1.61 to $1.63," he said....MORE