Wednesday, April 21, 2021

Roubini: "Is Stagflation Coming?"

Astute readers have probably picked up on the fact that except when quoting others, we attempt to avoid the word inflation, instead focusing on whether prices are rising (they are). The reason for this choice in framing the conversation is a concerted effort by folks who make money off of inflation, including financial advisors to insist there is no inflation. Or at worst, there is but it is transitory.

They don't want the Fed to pull the punch bowl and have the party end.

Their most common argument is that we are not seeing wage increases.

That's cool, we'll just talk prices.
(although we are seeing anecdotal reports that companies, the hospitality industry in particular, are paying bounties for new hires and are paying retention bonuses for existing employees. Anecdotes turn into statistics after a lag)

The author of this piece, Nouriel Roubini, hangs his hat at the NYU Stern School of Business and raises some more profound issues than our simple framing exercise does.
From Project Syndicate, April 14: 

Lost in the debate over whether today's ultra-loose fiscal and monetary policies will trigger painful inflation is the broader risk posed by potential negative supply shocks. From trade wars and de-globalization to aging populations and populist politics, there is no shortage of inflationary threats on the horizon.

NEW YORK – There is a growing debate about whether the inflation that will arise over the next few months will be temporary, reflecting the sharp bounce-back from the COVID-19 recession, or persistent, reflecting both demand-pull and cost-push factors.

Several arguments point to a persistent secular increase in inflation, which has remained below most central banks’ annual 2% target for over a decade. The first holds that the United States has enacted excessive fiscal stimulus for an economy that already appears to be recovering faster than expected. The additional $1.9 trillion of spending approved in March came on top of a $3 trillion package last spring and a $900 billion stimulus in December, and a $2 trillion infrastructure bill will soon follow. The US response to the crisis is thus an order of magnitude larger than its response to the 2008 global financial crisis.

The counter-argument is that this stimulus will not trigger lasting inflation, because households will save a large fraction of it to pay down debts. Moreover, investments in infrastructure will increase not just demand but also supply, by expanding the stock of productivity-enhancing public capital. But, of course, even accounting for these dynamics, the bulge of private savings brought by the stimulus implies that there will be some inflationary release of pent-up demand.

A second, related argument is that the US Federal Reserve and other major central banks are being excessively accommodative with policies that combine monetary and credit easing. The liquidity provided by central banks has already led to asset inflation in the short run, and will drive inflationary credit growth and real spending as economic re-opening and recovery accelerate. Some will argue that when the time comes, central banks can simply mop up the excess liquidity by drawing down their balance sheets and raising policy rates from zero or negative levels. But this claim has become increasingly hard to swallow.

Centrals banks have been large fiscal deficits in what amounts to “helicopter money” or an application of Modern Monetary Theory. At a time when public and private debt is growing from an already high baseline (425% of GDP in advanced economies and 356% globally), only a combination of low short- and long-term interest rates can keep debt burdens sustainable. Monetary-policy normalization at this point would crash bond and credit markets, and then stock markets, inciting a recession. Central banks have effectively lost their independence.

Here, the counter-argument is that when economies reach full capacity and full employment, central banks will do whatever it takes to maintain their credibility and independence. The alternative would be a de-anchoring of inflation expectations that would destroy their reputations and allow for runaway price growth....


That will do it for today's installment of The Price Is Wrong.
Coming up, SPACulation.

"Rent inflation is going to drive shelter inflation higher by the end of the summer."