Saturday, August 13, 2016

Shipping: Moeller Maersk Group Posts 90 Percent Profit Decline

From gCaptain:

Maersk Cost Cuts Ease Pain of Gloomy Shipping Forecast
A.P. Moller-Maersk’s progress in cutting costs reassured investors on Friday after the Danish shipping and oil giant reported a sharp decline in quarterly profit and its new chief executive confirmed that earnings would fall this year.

The Copenhagen-based company fired its CEO in June and replaced him with Soren Skou, head of its Maersk Line container business, indicating it could split it into separate companies and sell off part of the group, including its oil division.

Skou, a company veteran who has to respond to a shipping industry recession and tough oil markets, is expected to present the results of a strategy review in late September.

Maersk Oil is seen as a prime candidate for sale. In 2018, it will produce only half of what it does today after losing a major contract to operate Qatar’s largest offshore oilfield.

“Therefore we see less strategic rationale for having Maersk Oil in the Maersk Group going forward,” analyst Espen Landmark Fjermestad from Fearnley Securies said.

The group is fighting to remain the world’s largest container shipping carrier as a wave of mergers and acquisitions, particularly in Asia, creates new challengers.

Earnings figures illustrated the problems faced by Skou, who has been with the company for three decades.

Maersk’s net profit fell 90 percent to $101 million in April to June, amid significantly lower container freight rates. It maintained a forecast for underlying profit this year to be significantly below last year’s $3.1 billion.

Although Skou called the results unsatisfactory, Maersk shares were 3.2 percent higher by 1150 GMT as investors focused on its progress in reducing costs and the fact that the oil business performed better than expected.

“Cost reductions and operational optimizations…made a significant contribution to mitigating the impact of the negative market conditions,” Skou said in a statement.
Lower costs were mainly the result of 40 percent lower fuel prices, improved fleet utilisation and greater efficiencies....MORE