Phil Flynn lets the cat out of the bag on the most important factor for drilling and production planning in the current low-priced market for dry gas.
Just kidding about the "cat-out-of-the-bag" bit.
The pros live and breathe this stuff and any adviser, analyst or manager who doesn't know the difference between the Utica and Marcellus shales or who can't compute the relative value of Chesapeake's acreage vs. Range or the fact that Devon's NGL reserves are larger than Anadarko's has been/will be fired and/or sued.
From Inside Futures:
The Energy Report Natural gas rig counts may
have hit a ten year low but does that really mean that gas production
will fall significantly enough to avoid a storage crisis? Reuters new
reported that the number of rigs drilling for natural gas in the United
States fell by 18 this week to 613, data from oil services firm Baker
Hughes showed on Friday. Horizontal rigs -- the type most often used to
extract oil or gas from shale -- fell by 16 to 1,139. Oil rigs fell by 9
to 1,328.
Yet the Energy Information Agency says that when
it comes to gas if you are getting liquids you are less likely to cut
back production. The EIA says that combined marketed natural gas production from
the top five natural gas producing states Texas, Louisiana, Wyoming,
Oklahoma, and Colorado actually increased by about 7.5% in 2011,
although their share of total U.S. natural gas output fell slightly to
about 65% they show that marketed natural gas production from these
states in 2011 totaled 15.7 trillion cubic feet (Tcf).
The EIA says that the drop in the top states
combined share of total U.S. production reflects increased contributions
from other states, particularly those in which operators significantly
expanded development of shale gas formations. Shale gas production from
states such as Pennsylvania helped boost overall U.S. natural gas output
by almost 8% in 2011.
Due primarily to drilling programs in the
Marcellus shale formation, Pennsylvania's marketed natural gas
production in 2011 more than doubled to nearly 1.3 Tcf, according to
preliminary estimates from Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection.
Arkansas has also seen strong growth in its marketed natural gas
production, with output more than tripling since 2007 due mainly to
increased production in the Fayetteville shale play.
The EIA says that Alaska is the country's
second leading natural gas producer in terms of gross withdrawals, but
most of the state's production is not brought to market, as production
volumes far exceed local demand and there is insufficient pipeline
capacity to transport the gas to distant markets. Most of Alaska's
natural gas not brought to market is re-injected into existing oil
fields to provide sufficient pressure to maintain oil production rates.
The EIA highlights from the top marketed
natural gas producing states in 2011: Texas. Natural gas production
increased 4.5% from the year before to the highest level since 1980, due
in part to growing output from the Eagle Ford shale formation
where drillers who are aggressively pursuing high-value liquid
hydrocarbons are also producing growing amounts of natural gas....MORE