That is not sarcasm.
When Mr. Grantham made his "paradigm shift" call back in April most analysts, pro and con, looked at the longer term comments. I did, although I also had a contrary gut feel. Our May 5 post:
Commodities: Did Jeremy Grantham's 'Paradigm Shift' Letter Call the Intermediate-term Top
Remember: A paradigm is only worth twenty cents.There was more to the story. From June 2:
Like a lot of blogs we relayed Mr. Grantham's commodities call.
Here's the Jeffries Global Commodity ETF chart via Finviz:
I'll be back with more. In the meantime here's the April 26 post that linked to FT Alphaville's Grantham story:
The End of Cheap Commodities (or not)
Later that day:
Commodities Have Reached a Permanantly High Plateau* (or not)
Commodity Prices tend to be Mean-Reverting (cotton)
Commodities: "The Case for Human Ingenuity"
You can probably guess that I tend toward the optimistic.
Job Creation Disappears and Lord Rothschild Suggests You Panic, Sells Gold (and the Jeremy Grantham Commodity Call that Didn't Make the Headlines)
This didn't get a lot of play in late April and in fact I missed it on first reading GMO's letter. Most folks focused on the longer-term "paradigm shift" portion of what Grantham was saying and missed this because the shorter-tem negative bits were scattered throughout. Citywire wrapped it up in a neat package (note, this is not the Grantham piece linked in the article above) .That is almost stunning in its simplicity. The guy is good
Grantham predicts commodity crash on scale of ﬁnancial collapse
GMO’s self confessed perma-bear Jeremy Grantham has rung the alarm bell on rising commodity prices predicting a crash ‘not unlike the ﬁnancial collapse’.In his latest quarterly letter titled ‘Time to wake up: days of abundant resources and falling prices are over forever’, he argues that a combination of better than expected weather and a blip in China's 'warp speed' growth due to anything from wage increases, misappropriated capital in large, unnecessary projects, rising debt or a house price bubble, could drag commodity prices down dramatically.He warned: ‘If the weather and China syndromes strike together, it will surely produce the second “once in a lifetime” event in three years.’
Elaborating, he said: 'Several of my smart colleagues agree with Jim Chanos that China’s structural imbalances will cause at least one wheel to come off of their economy within the next 12 months. This is painful when travelling at warp speed – 10% a year in GDP growth.'
'The signiﬁcance here is that given China’s overwhelming inﬂuence on so many commodities, especially in terms of the percentage China represents of new growth in global demand, any general economic stutter in China can mean very big declines in some of their prices.'
'You can assess on your own the probabilities of a stumble in the next year or so. At the least, I would put it at 1 in 4, while some of my colleagues think the odds are much higher.'
'If China stumbles or if the weather is better than expected, a probability I would put at, say, 80%, then commodity prices will decline a lot. But if both events occur together, it will very probably break the commodity markets en masse. Not unlike the ﬁnancial collapse.'...MORE