Friday, October 12, 2018

JP Morgan's Kolanovic: "The Biggest Selling Pressure Was From Option Gamma Hedging On Wednesday"

Via ZeroHedge:
Earlier today, we discussed how after the last 2-day furious selloff, the human-machine-human fingerpointing blame game had begun, with carbon-based traders accusing such systematic and risk-targeting quant strategies as risk-parity funds, CTAs, volatility targeting funds, and trend followers (which account for about $1.5 trillion in assets) for being behind the sharp selloff. This followed our own take on how much selling CTAs were responsible for on both Wednesday and Thursday, after selling triggers were hit.

Of course, any time there is a discussion of systemic, and quant, trading - and especially selling - JPM's head quant Marko Kolanovic can not be far behind. Unfortunately, just like during the February selloff, which Kolanovic failed to predict, so this time Marko's value added is only from the perspective of a post mortem of what everyone else has already observed.

Furthermore, it was Kolanovic who just a few weeks back said that there was no pressure from systematic selling, and instead the only driver of significance was corporate profits which is why he predicted smooth sailing ahead.
Oops.

So a few moments ago, having failed to predict this week's selling, the JPMorgan quant released his latest market update and wrote that Wednesday’s selloff was largely technical in nature, "with systematic strategies following the same selling template as in the Feb 5th selloff", a template which Kolanovic had failed to notice then too.

Discussing the catalyst behind the selling, Kolanovic said that fundamental fears were about rising yields and the Fed’s more hawkish stance, while noting that "in terms of systematic strategies that drove the selloff – by far the biggest selling pressure was from option gamma hedging on Wednesday."
But don't worry: the same option gamma hedging risk that Kolanovic failed to warn about, is now supposedly gone or rather, as he puts it "balanced", and "can turn into a positive impact, i.e. option hedgers buying equities."
For instance, if the market were to hold its gains during the day, it could result in a squeeze higher by end of the day from gamma hedging flows.
On the other hand, one can counter that with the Dow wiping out most of its gains (at least until the Kolanovic note made the rounds), the selling can accelerate.
According to Kolanovic, other large selling flows were from the same CTAs - which we cautioned about on both Wednesday and Thursday, yet which JPMorgan failed to mention even once - that started in indices such as Russell 2000 and Nasdaq last week, eventually spreading into the S&P 500 on Wednesday.
CTA selling tends to be relatively fast and is likely largely behind us given the already low CTA equity beta, and the fact that 12M momentum on S&P 500 will most likely hold positive (>2550). The remaining part of systematic selling is from volatility targeting (insurance, parity funds, etc.) which will go on for several more days.
In any case, with the market suffering its biggest weekly selloff since February, one which Kolanovic not only did not foresee but instead called for further upside, he is now predictably, optimistic:
Looking at these three groups of sellers, CTAs have already executed the bulk of their selling, option hedging risk is now symmetric, and Volatility Targeters will sell over a longer period of time. As such, we think that the majority of systematic selling is behind us (~70%).
Additionally, Kolanovic notes that since volatility targeting funds tend to sell over a number of days (e.g. 3-10 days for various models), "these flows should be easier to digest by the market"... unless of course they aren't.

In addition to model buying, the JPMorganite also hopes to boost trader bullishness by noting that flows that may counter selling are "buybacks (e.g. ASR programs not subject to blackout), fundamental buyers attracted by cheap valuation (P/E below historical average), as well as fixed weight portfolio rebalances (e.g. pensions rebalancing on triggers)."...MORE