HT up front to The Volokh Conspiracy who writes:
Duke University Law School’s Steven L. Schwarcz sent me the draft of his new paper, back in September, but the semester was just getting underway, and in any case, it seemed to me then that a paper titled “Rollover Risk: Ideating a U.S. Debt Default” was referring enough to a possible world that I could wait a few weeks to comment. A few weeks later, the world Steve describes suddenly seems much closer, and I recommend it to you for a sober, serious commercial and finance law professor’s take on how default might occur, avoiding it, consequences, and ways of mitigating consequences. The paper makes a core observation that illiquidity risks are different from insolvency risks, though the former can lead (quickly in some instances) to insolvency, as was seen in the 2008 financial crisis....MOREFrom the Social Science Research Network, August 28, 2013:
Abstract:
This article examines how a U.S. debt default might
occur, how it could be avoided, its potential consequences if not
avoided, and how those consequences could be mitigated. To that end, the
article differentiates defaults caused by insolvency from defaults
caused by illiquidity. The latter, which are potentiated by rollover
risk (the risk that the government will be temporarily unable to borrow
sufficient funds to repay its maturing debt), are not only plausible but
have occurred in the past. Moreover, the ongoing controversy over the
federal debt ceiling and the rise of the shadow-banking system make
these types of defaults even more likely today. The article also
examines how a U.S. debt default could be avoided, discussing steps —
including monetizing debt and printing money to pay maturing debt — that
the government could take to facilitate debt repayment, as well as
limits on the government’s ability to avoid defaulting. The article then
examines the consequences of a U.S. debt default, demonstrating that
even a temporary default caused by illiquidity would have severe
economic and systemic consequences, significantly raising the cost of
borrowing and causing securities markets to plummet. Such a default
would also raise a host of legal issues, including constitutional
questions of first impression under the Fourteenth Amendment. Finally,
the article explores how the negative consequences of a default might be
mitigated, potentially through a debt restructuring or even a possible
IMF bailout.
Free download (38 page PDF)
Possibly related:
New York Fed: Rollover Risk
And more directly:
The Black Swan Isn't the Debt Ceiling, It is Holders of U.S. Treasuries Asking for Cash Rather Than Rolling the Paper