Wednesday, November 20, 2024

"Ford, facing economic headwinds and weak EV sales, to cut 4,000 jobs in Europe"

It is not easy building electric vehicles profitably.*

From the Associated Press, November 20:

Ford Motor Co. says it will reduce its workforce by 4,000 in Europe and the U.K. by the end of 2027, citing headwinds from the economy and pressure from increased competition and weaker than expected sales of electric cars.

Ford said Wednesday most of the job cuts would come in Germany and would be carried out in consultation with employee representatives.

Of the total, 2,900 jobs would be lost in Germany, 800 in Britain and 300 in other European Union countries. Ford has 28,000 employees in Europe, and 174,000 worldwide.

“The global auto industry continues to be in a period of significant disruption as it shifts to electrified mobility,” the company said in a statement. “The transformation is particularly intense in Europe where automakers face significant competitive and economic headwinds while also tackling a misalignment between CO2 regulations and consumer demand for electrified vehicles,” the statement said. 

In Europe, automakers must sell enough electric vehicles to meet new, lower limits for fleet average carbon dioxide emissions in 2025, and face a longer term 2035 EU goal of reducing emissions to zero, which would mean the elimination of most vehicles with internal combustion engines....

....MUCH MORE
*
Here's December 8 2023's "Western Legacy Automakers Probably Won't Be Long-Term Survivors":

Because their current business is being mandated and legislated out of existence the Western marques, barring some serious breakthroughs in small-scale hydrogen or methanol, will have to pivot to EV's. 

And they won't be able to compete.

It almost appears that the gifting of the electric vehicle and solar industries to the Chinese was deliberate.....MUCH MORE

"COP29: Climate finance talks face 'hardest' stage as summit nears end-game"

If you take-away nothing else from our little blog take this:

Climate negotiations are always and everywhere a monetary phenomena.

Apologies to Milton Friedman's ghost for the re-purposing of the phrase.

From Reuters, November 20:

  • Draft text set to drop later on Wednesday night
  • Annual finance for poorer countries dominates talks
  • Big gap in expectations from different country blocs
Climate negotiators were warned on Wednesday that the "hardest part" was about to start in talks over how much money should be provided to developing countries to help them adapt to climate-fuelled weather disasters and transition to cleaner energy.
 
Figuring out what form that funding takes, who pays and how much is central to the COP29 talks. With a notional Friday deadline looming, frustration over the lack of progress so far was starting to seep out of the negotiating rooms.
 
The chief negotiator of the COP29 summit's host Azerbaijan said "now the hardest part begins" ahead of a fresh text which is due to drop at midnight (2000 GMT) in the capital Baku.
 
Progress at the annual summit is typically marked through regular draft documents that get whittled down to a final deal.
 
Australia's environment minister Chris Bowen, tasked by the COP presidency with gathering the range of views in the negotiating rooms, said he had heard three proposals for the annual figure to be given by richer governments.
 
These were $900 billion, $600 billion and $440 billion, which compared with a previously announced starting point of $100 billion from the European Union.
 
EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said the bloc was not willing to talk about the figure until it had more structural details, adding: "Otherwise you will have a shopping basket with a price, but you don't know exactly what is in there".
 
Egypt's Minister of Environment, Yasmine Fouad, said countries had agreed not to treat the better off developing nations the same as richer ones when it came to paying in....
....MUCH MORE

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Chief AI Scientist at Meta, Yann LeCun: "I don't wanna say "I told you so", but I told you so."

Via Threads, November 13:

yannlecun

6d
6 days ago

I don't wanna say "I told you so", but I told you so.
Quote: "Ilya Sutskever, co-founder of AI labs Safe Superintelligence (SSI) and OpenAI, told Reuters recently that results from scaling up pre-training - the phase of training an AI model that uses a vast amount of unlabeled data to understand language patterns and structures - have plateaued." ...reuters.com/techn…

***

6d
6 days ago


So just to be clear...
@yannlecun you're saying your boss just bet the house on something, you already knew was gonna fail?
Normally I would dismiss your predictions, because you're pretty much the Reverse-Cramer of Ai. (despite your contributions)
But you claim @ilyasu2 said this (who, contrary to yourself, actually is right a lot)
Sure wonder how @zuck and @cleoabram Feel about the biggest bet for @meta now...

The Mr. Metaverse poster, Aragorn Meulendijks, seems a bit of an arrogant dijk.

LeCun responded:

No. You misunderstand.
The following things are simultaneously, true:
1. LLM are very useful.
2. Training them will require increasing computing resources over the next few years.
3. But LLMs will *not* reach human-level intelligence.
4. New architectures are needed.
5. I've been saying this for many years, long before LLMs captured everyone's attention.
6. Meta-FAIR has been focusing on these new architectures for a while now.
7. Watch the Columbia Lecture if you want to know more.

THREAD

Here's the Reuters story LeCun linked to:

OpenAI and others seek new path to smarter AI as current methods hit limitations 

If interested see also:

"Analysts update Nvidia stock price target ahead of earnings"

As has been the case for the last couple years, the reported quarter will be important but the guidance for the next report will be much more so.

From TheStreet.com, Nov 19, 2024 7:47 PM EST: 

This is what could happen next to Nvidia shares.

We'll know in a little while.

AI-chip colossus Nvidia  (NVDA)  is scheduled to report fiscal-third-quarter earnings on Nov. 20 and the whole tech world is watching.....

****

....Investment firms have been adjusting their price targets for Nvidia ahead of the company's quarterly results.

Truist raised the investment firm's price target on Nvidia to $167 from $148 and maintained a buy rating, according to The Fly.

The firm said that it expected Nvidia to post results above the analyst consensus while also expressing confidence in 2025 owing to a robust backlog. 

Nvidia's management commentary will focus on the next drivers of growth after large language models — data processing and physical AI — and Truist is raising its estimates based on higher growth expectations in the data-center end market. 

Its fiscal 2024 earnings per share view is up 4 cents to $2.85 and the fiscal 2025 view was raised 49 cents to $4.18, Truist said.

Large language models can perform a variety of tasks, including generating human-like content, analyzing data and improving customer experience.

Stifel raised its price target on Nvidia to $180 from $165 while maintaining a buy rating on the shares.....

....MUCH MORE

For what it's worth the stock has stopped at the $149-and-change level four times since November 7th (all-time high $149.77 on the 8th). If it fails to get through that in tomorrow's after-hours trading, and then hold it on Thursday I would expect hot money to go in search of other trades.  

Daily highs:

Nov 14 - $149.00

Nov 13 - $149.33

Nov 12 - $149.65 

Nov 08 - $149.77

$147.01 up $6.86 (+4.89%) at today's regular session close, settling at $147.70 up $0.69 after-hours.

If I had to guess, and I'm only a marginally good guesser, I'd say beat-and-raise from the company and 'meh' from the market.The joys of the Keynesian Beauty Contest: trying to figure-out both the report and how the judges respond to the report.

THIS Is THE Guy You Want In Charge Of Civil Defense

Holy Moly, he looks like he got up from the crypt to deliver his message:

https://cdn-images.the-express.com/img/dynamic/12/940x/secondary/Swedish-Civil-Defence-minister-Carl-Oskar-Bohlin-presnets-If-the-crisis-or-war-comes-286796.avif?r=1731953966471

Swedish Civil Defence minister Carl-Oskar Bohlin presents 'If the crisis or war comes' 

From The Express (U.S.), November 18:

WW3 panic as Sweden, Finland and Norway release new 'how to survive war' booklets
Nordic states are rolling out war-time guidance booklets, as fears of a global conflict spread.

....MUCH MORE

I would listen to him, every single word.

"Fed Rate Cuts to Spur $2 Trillion Money-Fund Exit, Apollo’s Slok Says"

From Bloomberg via Yahoo Finance, November 19:

The steady stampede into money-market funds is likely to reverse as the Federal Reserve keeps pushing down interest rates, giving investors incentive to shift cash into higher-yielding assets, according to Apollo Global Management’s chief economist Torsten Slok.

“Where will the $2 trillion added to money market accounts go now that the Fed is cutting,” Slok wrote in a note to clients on Tuesday, citing the inflow to money-market funds since the Fed began raising rates in March 2022.

“The most likely scenario is that money will leave money market accounts and flow into higher-yielding assets such as credit, including investment grade private credit.”

Slok, who warned of a such an exodus earlier this year, has stuck to his call even after investors keep piling in. The assets of such funds swelled last week to $7 trillion for the first time ever, defying speculation that investors would pull out cash once the Fed started nudging interest rates down from a more than two-decade high....

...MORE

Chasing yield, adding risk in the last six weeks of 2024 and into 2025.

As Mr. Seinfeld said, "Good luck with all that."

"The German army takes steps toward economic militarization"

 Three things up front:

1) The Ukraine/NATO/Russia situation is accelerating and is starting to get a real July 1914 vibe to it.

2) Turkey has seemed almost as supportive of Russia as it is of its NATO allies.

3) For now we are continuing to spell the country like the bird. Much as we love umlauts and diaeresis diacritics, typing the unicode ü in "Türkiye" is a pain.*

From Turkey's , :

In Germany, preparations appear to be underway for a potential conflict that could directly impact the Federal Republic much more than before. According to Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), the Bundeswehr has initiated training programs for companies based on the newly approved German Operational Plan. This classified strategy document reportedly spans 1,000 pages and outlines critical infrastructure and buildings deemed essential for military protection.

The report highlights plan to address a potential Russian threat, focusing on defense strategies and escalation scenarios. Among the measures discussed are steps to ensure the resilience of the civilian economy during crises.

Civil servants ‘train’ companies in Hamburg

One notable aspect of the strategy involves collaboration with businesses. A recent event hosted by the Hamburg Chamber of Commerce showcased this approach, where Lieutenant Colonel Jörn Plischke offered concrete recommendations.

“For every hundred employees, train at least five additional truck drivers that you do not need,” Plischke suggested, citing the high reliance on Eastern European drivers—70% of all trucks in Germany are driven by workers from this region. He raised concerns about a potential labor shortage should war break out in Eastern Europe.

Chamber of Commerce stresses ‘resilient economy’

The Bundeswehr advises businesses to create detailed crisis management plans, including assigning specific roles to employees. Self-sufficiency measures, such as installing diesel generators or wind turbines, are also recommended. The Bundeswehr has called for similar training events to be conducted nationwide, with implementation overseen by state commands.

Malte Heyne, General Manager of the Chamber of Commerce, emphasized the importance of these initiatives, stating:

“A well-prepared and resilient economy is essential for Germany’s civil and military defense.”

Greens propose special funding for armed forces

As early elections approach, debates surrounding Germany’s military spending are intensifying. Green Economy Minister Robert Habeck is advocating for a new “special fund” to bolster military capabilities before the elections, fearing that a two-thirds majority may be unattainable if the AfD and BSW gain more seats in the Bundestag....

*Unicode Character "ü" (U+00FC)

The character ü (Latin Small Letter U With Diaeresis) is represented by the Unicode codepoint U+00FC. It is encoded in the Latin-1 Supplement block, which belongs to the Basic Multilingual Plane. It was added to Unicode in version 1.1 (June, 1993). It is HTML encoded as ü.

https://unicodeplus.com/U+00FC

Mr. Victoria Nuland: "How the Ukraine Counteroffensive Can Still Succeed"

It's a bit concerning that we are counting on Vladimir Putin of all people to be the sane one in this situation.
Sixteen months ago this is what was being passed off as high-level analysis.

I'm being facetious with the "Mr. Nuland" bit. Although his wife is the more notorious and more powerful member of the marriage, Robert Kagan is a warmongering neocon in his own right.

He and his two co-authors write under the imprimatur of the Institute for the Study of War and here at TIME. By-the-bye the ISW was founded and is run by his sister,  Kimberly Kagan.

This piece looks to be around seven thousand words. It almost reads as if the writers think war is a giant board game.

From TIME Magazine, August 3, 2023:

The situation in Ukraine still favors Kyiv despite the limited progress made in the counteroffensive so far. Ukrainian forces attempted a limited mechanized penetration of prepared Russian defenses in the south in early to mid-June, but failed to break through the Russian lines. They then switched to slower and more careful operations while disrupting Russian rear areas with long-range precision strikes. Ukraine began the next, reportedly main, phase of its counteroffensive on July 26 with a determined drive to penetrate Russian lines in western Zaporizhia Oblast. It’s far too soon to evaluate the outcome of that effort, which is underway as of the time of this writing, but it is vital to manage expectations. Ukrainian forces are fighting now to break through the first line of long-prepared Russian defenses. Several lines lie behind it, stretching for many miles. Ukrainian progress will very likely alternate periods of notable tactical advances with periods, possibly long periods, of pause and some setbacks. Much as we might hope that the road to the Sea of Azov will simply open for Ukrainian forces the odds are high that fighting will remain hard, casualties high, and frustration will be a constant companion. All of which is normal in war.

But the Ukrainian counteroffensive can succeed in any of several ways. First, the current Ukrainian mechanized breakthrough could succeed, and the Ukrainians could exploit it deeply enough to unhinge part or all of the Russian lines. Second, Russian forces, already suffering serious morale and other systemic problems, could break under the pressure and begin to withdraw in a controlled or uncontrolled fashion. Third, a steady pressure and interdiction campaign supported by major efforts such as the one now underway can generate gaps in the Russian lines that Ukrainian forces can exploit at first locally, but then for deeper penetrations. The first and second possibilities are relatively unlikely but possible.

The third is the most probable path to Ukrainian success. It will be slower and more gradual than the other two—and slower than Ukraine’s Western backers desire and expect. It depends on the West providing Ukraine with a constant flow of equipment likely over many months so that Ukraine can maintain its pressure until the Russian forces offer the kinds of frontline cracks the Ukrainians can exploit. It is not primarily a matter of attrition. The slow pace of the pressure campaign Ukraine had been using before July 26 is designed to minimize Ukrainian losses. It is not primarily oriented towards attriting Russians either, but rather towards steadily forcing the Russians out of their prepared defensive positions in ways that the Ukrainians can take advantage of to make operationally significant advances. It is still maneuver warfare rather than attritional warfare, just at a slower pace. It therefore requires patience, but it can succeed.

The Ukrainians have been successful with such an approach both in Kherson and in the Kharkiv counteroffensive. The rapid collapse of Russian positions around Kharkiv in October 2022 was the result of months of steady Ukrainian pressure on the ground and in the rear. Ukrainian forces stopped determined Russian advances around Izyum in southeastern Kharkiv Oblast and then launched their own limited counterattacks in mid-September 2022. They targeted Russian logistics hubs and concentration areas behind the front lines for months before launching their decisive effort. That effort caught the Russians by surprise, leading to the sudden collapse of Russian defenses and rapid, dramatic Ukrainian gains. A similar approach in Kherson did not achieve surprise and so did not generate such a large-scale rapid Russian collapse, but it still liberated a large and heavily defended area. A similar approach in southern Ukraine now can offer similar prospects for success.

Ukraine has reportedly committed the main body of the forces it had prepared for counteroffensive operations, although it is not clear what proportion of those forces are actively engaged in combat. Ukraine retains the initiative and benefits from the many advantages discussed below. Its counteroffensive could nevertheless fail. The Russians might prove more resilient than they seem. The Ukrainians might be unable to develop the tactical skills they need to overcome well-prepared Russian defenses. The West might fall short of providing Ukraine the equipment and support it needs in time. The last is the only thing fully under the West’s control. As long as Ukraine still has a serious prospect of liberating strategically vital areas, which it still does, the West’s task is to ensure that Ukraine has what it needs to succeed.

Russia’s Problems

Reasons for confidence in the possibility of significant Ukrainian successes are closely tied to a number of fundamental challenges inherent to the Russian position in Ukraine and the Russian military. These cannot be resolved in 2023, so the opportunities they offer Ukraine are not fleeting. At the strategic level, the geometry of the theater favors Ukraine. At the strategic and operational levels, the lack of Russian reserves forces difficult and complex choices on the Russian military command in the face of Ukrainian counteroffensives. And at the tactical level the way the Russians are conducting defensive operations puts much greater pressure on Russian combat units than the lack of regular or large-scale movements on the map would suggest. All these problems are exacerbated by fundamental flaws in the Russian military itself.

Theater Geometry

The defining characteristic of this phase of the war is that the Russians must defend a ground line of communication (GLOC) consisting of a road and a rail line that runs from Rostov-on-Don at the northeastern edge of the Sea of Azov to Crimea. Vast quantities of food, fuel, ammunition, personnel, and other supplies are required by the tens of thousands of Russian troops in southern Ukraine and must travel along this road and rail line. The Russians were already relying on (and dependent on) this GLOC to supply their troops in southern Ukraine before the most recent break in the Kerch Strait Bridge, because Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered Russian forces not to rely on the bridge for their logistics after the last major attack on the bridge. The break in that road bridge deprives the Russians of any fallback if the Ukrainians can threaten or cut the Rostov-to-Crimea GLOC.

This state of affairs favors Ukraine in an important way. If the Ukrainians can reach the Sea of Azov anywhere and hold their positions, they will have cut the GLOC. The Russians, thus, have to hold the entire thing. Put another way, the Ukrainians only have to win and hold in one sector to render virtually all the Russian-held territory west of their advance untenable. The Russians have to win everywhere all the time. The Ukrainians don’t even have to make it all the way to the water. The GLOC does not hug the coast all the way, for one thing, and is thus closer to the current front lines in some areas than the shoreline. If the Ukrainians can push to within artillery range of the GLOC (about 25 kilometers), moreover, they can begin to shell it intensively in a way that would badly degrade the Russians’ ability to continue to use it. The Ukrainians are thus free to choose any sector of the line or take advantage of any hole that opens anywhere in the line, to push to cut the GLOC in a way very likely to collapse the Russian defenses west of that break. The Russians cannot allow any such holes to appear.

Reserves

The Russians suffer from an additional challenge in that they lack operational or strategic reserves. Reserves are uncommitted combat forces able to respond to developing situations in the battlespace. They can be used to take advantage of opportunities such as to break through the lines during an offensive operation or to handle emergencies, for example by rushing in to close a gap in friendly lines before the enemy can exploit it. Reserves are essential in mechanized maneuver war when the combatants can break through each others’ lines and then exploit those breakthroughs to make large-scale and rapid advances. Reserves can play a different role in protracted war, whether attritional or to simply slow maneuver, because the frontline troops in such a conflict become exhausted over time. Reserves can then rotate onto the frontlines to allow the exhausted troops there to move to safer areas in the rear, rest, receive replacements and new equipment, and prepare to take their turns again on the front lines. A military without significant reserves has to require its troops on the frontlines to stay there indefinitely and can temporarily generate the effects of reserves only by pulling forces from one sector of the line to another to deal with unexpected opportunities or reverses. This is exactly the situation the Russians find themselves in now, and the Russian force generation apparatus is currently incapable of bringing up quality reserves to fulfill these roles fast enough.

Lack of dramatic advances or withdrawals does not mean lack of action, still less stalemate. Ukrainian forces continue to press Russian defenders all along the lines with combinations of artillery strikes and ground combat. The Russian defenders are tiring—and complaining about it publicly. It is clear that Russian Armed Forces Chief of Staff Army General Valery Gerasimov, who is also the overall theater commander for Ukraine, has established a policy that seriously limits troop rotations across the theater. One Russian senior commander resigned or was fired over the issue. Russian soldiers or their families periodically release videos complaining about the lack of rotations. Russian milbloggers constantly express concern about the problem. These indicators clearly suggest that Gerasimov’s policy is largely pinning the same Russian forces on active front lines for a long time, forcing them to continue to receive Ukrainian artillery strikes and ground attacks for weeks or months without rest. Since the nature of the Russian defense requires considerable activity of the defenders, as we will consider below, the burden on soldiers required to execute that defense continuously for a long time is wearing....

....MUCH MORE

Possibly also of interest, posted three weeks before Russia's invasion of Ukraine:

Ukraine: NeoCons Nuland and Kagan; A Family Business of Perpetual War

This piece is seven years old but evergreen. The warmongers are back in the news, Kagan because he is pitching civil war in the U.S. and Nuland because there are some loose ends (secrets to bury) in Ukraine, dating back to the 2014 coup and some serious skullduggery before and after. Looking from the outside-in, it appears Nuland has some regime change planned for Belarus as well. And then maybe Poland.

Polish politics is such a thorn in the EU's (and NATO's) side that a change of government may be the neocon's only solution for getting what they want. Which would be hilarious if it weren't so serious; Stalin ran into the same thing trying to install communism. Unlike East Germany which took to it quite easily, to the point that many of the old people still have Ostalgie (East-Nostalgie). 

Stalin got so frustrated that he said trying to impose communism on Poland was like putting a saddle on a cow [NYT August 1989, some have him saying the same thing about Germany but I know of no ref.] Similar sentiments in Brussels, I'm sure.

From the now-deceased Robert Parry, writing at Consortium News, March 20, 2015, i.e. a year after the Maidan coup:....

And:

Sunday, November 14, 2021
Russia—Ukraine+USA: It's Probably Nothing (plus Ozzy)
Anybody know where Nuland and Kagan are?
Via the Twitter box: 

Friday, January 14, 2022
"White House: Russia prepping pretext for Ukraine invasion"

Dear General Milley,

Counterattack if you must but DO NOT take the Paris - Borodino route.

The off-season discount seems attractive but really it's,

Bad, bad, no good, very bad.

Yr. Pal, 

https://i2.wp.com/www.tor.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Napoleon-Delaroche.jpg?fit=740%2C416&type=vertical&quality=100&ssl=1

Lil Boney

p.s. Is Victoria Nuland still married to that Kagan guy?
She hot, in a Harpy/Valkyrie sort of way
—N.Bonaparte
 
July 2022

The writer of this piece, M.K Bhadrakumar is more pro-Russian than he appears in this blog post and we've only linked to him once before -Vatican Frontruns The Rest Of Europe To Buy Russian Gas. However, at this moment seeing the world through the lens of his former life in the Indian Foreign Service might bring more value to the reader than tuning in to Fox or CNN or hanging out with the warmongers at the Nuland/Kagan Institute for the Study of War....

And dozens of posts on Ms. Nuland solo.

Risk/Prop Bets: How unlikely is a doomsday catastrophe?

Before we get into the meat of the matter, some things to know upfront. From the introduction to 2018's "Tips And Tricks For Investing In 'End of the World Funds'":

As unauthorized representatives for Long or Short Capital's End of the World Puts this is an area of profound interest from which we have gleaned some insight:

1) Should the world end, collecting on your bet can be a challenge. Know your counterparty!
     And possibly more important, demand collateral!
2) The swings in end of the world product prices can be dramatic.
3) Prognosticators have predicted 100,000 of the last 0 termination events....

And from arXiv (astrophysics) at Cornell:

How unlikely is a doomsday catastrophe?

Max Tegmark (MIT), Nick Bostrom (Oxford)
Numerous Earth-destroying doomsday scenarios have recently been analyzed, including breakdown of a metastable vacuum state and planetary destruction triggered by a "strangelet'' or microscopic black hole. We point out that many previous bounds on their frequency give a false sense of security: one cannot infer that such events are rare from the the fact that Earth has survived for so long, because observers are by definition in places lucky enough to have avoided destruction. We derive a new upper bound of one per 10^9 years (99.9% c.l.) on the exogenous terminal catastrophe rate that is free of such selection bias, using planetary age distributions and the relatively late formation time of Earth....


If interested we mentioned Bostrom in "The Roubini Cascade: Are we heading for a Greater Depression?". His Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford seems to have moved on from the mundane climate cataclysm or cosmic fireball ending everything, to a very real, very serious examination of whether or not Artificial Intelligence may be the nail in humanity's coffin, so to speak. 

And related:

Just Hear Me Out: "Would Nuclear Winter Cancel Out Global Warming?"

 From Hackaday, January 25, 2022:

Nuclear war was very much a front-of-mind issue during the fraught political climate of the Cold War era. Since then, atomic sabre rattling has been less frequent, though has never quite disappeared entirely.

Outside of the direct annihilation caused by nuclear war, however, is the threat of nuclear winter. The basic concept is simple: in the aftermath of a major nuclear war, the resulting atmospheric effects could lead to a rapid cooling in global temperatures.

Some say it couldn’t ever happen, while others – including Futurama – suggest with varying degrees of humor that it could help cancel out the effects of global warming. But what is the truth?

Hard data is isn’t really available, as thus far there have been  no large-scale nuclear wars for scientists to measure. Several studies have explored the concept of nuclear winter, however, and explored its potential effects.

How Does It Work, Anyway?

Hundreds of large firestorms triggered by nuclear weapons could loft soot into the upper atmosphere, serving as the causative mechanism of the “nuclear winter” theory. The nuclear aspect is only as an ignition source; any other cause of widespread firestorms could do the same. Image Credit: Public Domain, Jim Peaco

The basic concept of nuclear winter is simple. In a large nuclear conflict, where nuclear weapons are used in strategic strikes against urban and industrial areas, large-scale fires would rage out of control. These fires would then loft large amounts of black carbon soot into the upper reaches of the atmosphere. Once there, the smoke particles might then be lofted further up into the stratosphere as they absorb heat from the sun, up to a point where the particles are too high to be quickly “rained out” of the air by precipitation. These particles would then essentially shade the surface, creating a cooling effect.

Papers published as recently as 2007 suggests that a full-scale nuclear war between superpowers could cause a drop in global average temperatures by as much as 8 °C . If that doesn’t sound dramatic, to put it into perspective the average temperature was 5 °C lower during the last ice age 18,000 years ago.

Modelling from researchers on the topic suggests that the major knock on effect on agriculture would be crippling to humanity around the globe. Temperatures in critical growing regions in Ukraine and Iowa, for example, could see daily minimum temperatures reach below freezing for several years, making growing food crops near-impossible. Global famine would be the result.

This photo is often mistaken for being a shot of the mushroom cloud created by the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. However, it is in fact an image of the pyrocumulus cloud created in the firestorm that happened in the aftermath of the attack. Image credit: Public domain, US Military

Running simulations with newer climate models has continued to turn up similar results, even in recent studies. Those studies are run with similar base numbers that suggest an all-out nuclear war using up most of the stockpiles of major superpowers would loft around 150 teragrams of soot into the atmopshere. However, that value remains an assumption that has drawn criticism from some sectors.....

....MUCH MORE

One of the links in outro of last week's "People Are ‘Doom Spending’ to Deal With the State of the World" may be relevant:

"Social resilience to nuclear winter: lessons from the Late Antique Little Ice Age"
This was a very tough time for homo sapiens.

From the journal Global Security: Health, Science and Policy:

ABSTRACT
The threat of nuclear winter from a regional nuclear war is an existential hazard that must be actively addressed by policy makers to ensure the shared future of humanity. Here a cross-cultural analysis of 20 societies that experienced the Late Antique Little Ice Age (ca. 536–556CE) is performed in the hope of providing security policy makers with an empirical example of social resilience mechanisms. The climatic conditions of the Late Antique Little Ice Age are strikingly similar to those modelled as resulting from a regional nuclear war employing low-yield nuclear weapons, and thus provides a context in which mechanisms of resilience to nuclear winter might be empirically identified. It is argued that broad political participation fostering bridging ties between communities, agencies, and organisations was a key element of social resilience to the Late Antique Little Ice Age, and may indicate a means to foster resilience to nuclear winter today....

....MUCH MORE

Also:
"Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection"

"...from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion--that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain..."

 —Abraham Lincoln at Gettysburg, November 19, 1863

From our 150th anniversary of the dedication of the cemetery post.

Ukraine Bombs Russia With U.S.-Made Missiles, Moscow Lowers Threshold For Nuclear Weapons Use. Begins Mass-Producing Radiation Shelters

First up, Bloomberg, November 19:

Ukraine Hits Russia With Western-Made Missiles for First Time: Report

New York Times, November 19:

Putin Lowers Russia’s Threshold for Using Nuclear Arms

Pravda (English), Nov. 19:

Russia has begun mass-producing mobile shelters "KUB-M"  

And Russia's rationale for reacting to these particular weapons, via Pravda, November 17:

PUTIN THREE WEEKS AGO ON RESPONSE TO THE THREAT OF A LONG-RANGE MISSILE ATTACK ON RUSSIAN TERRITORY: “our military department is thinking about it and will offer several options for response”

....The point is not whether someone will be allowed to use these weapons against Russia or not.

I already mentioned this in my very first statement, when I was in St. Petersburg.

Ukrainian troops cannot use these weapons alone.

This can only be done by specialists from NATO countries, because this requires space reconnaissance, which of course Ukraine does not have, we understand.

We need specialists who, based on this reconnaissance data, will go on flight missions and perform a number of other manipulations.

The Ukrainian military cannot do this alone.

Therefore, what is happening now is all being done by NATO officers.

The only question is whether they will allow themselves to strike deep into Russian territory or not ? That is the question.

Of course, we will have to react accordingly.

How to react, when, where exactly, it is too early to talk about it.

But of course, our military department is thinking about it and will offer various answers...

....MORE

Recently:

November 17 - "The Decision To Allow U.S.-Made Munitions To Bomb Russia Sure Got Moscow's Attention"

November 18 - Following The American ATACMS Decision The Russian Whackadoodles Are Coming Out In Force: "....A demonstration nuclear explosion off the coast of Great Britain and France"  

Monday, November 18, 2024

Antitrust: Department of Justice Will Recommend Judge Force Google To Divest Chrome Browser (GOOG)

From Investing.com, November 18:

DOJ to recommend Google sell off Chrome- Bloomberg

Investing.com-- The U.S. The Department of Justice plans to ask a judge to force Google owner Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:GOOGL) to sell off its Chrome browser as part of its antitrust probe into the tech giant, Bloomberg reported on Monday.

The department plans to ask Judge Amit Mehta of the District of Columbia, who had earlier this year ruled Google had an illegal monopoly in the search engine market, to make the ruling, Bloomberg reported.

DOJ officials also plan to ask Mehta to impose data licensing requirements on Alphabet and to address its plans for artificial intelligence and the Android operating system, the report showed. 

Chrome represents a key point of focus for antitrust officials because it usually serves as a means of access for many to Google’s search. The browser is by far the most-used in the world, with data from web traffic analyst Statcounter showing Chrome with a 66.65% market share as of October 2024....

....MORE

Even if the government's suggestion is agreed to by the judge it may not be enough.
From October's "US Weighs Google Breakup in Historic Big Tech Antitrust Case" (GOOG)":
I would like YouTube please, there's an entire non-literate addressable market for Climateer Investing to conquer.

And September's "What Is an Effective Remedy in the Google Search Case? (GOOG; EVIL)":

Dismemberment.

And then, when you're done with the officers and directors... 

Okay, just kidding. The most logical remedy is to regulate search as a public utility. And if they push back against that, dismemberment.

I have to stop reading medieval history before going to sleep at night.

How's about we rip the company's index from the still-living beast and...

That's it, from now on it's Pollyanna with her 'glad game.' And Candide. And maybe Leibniz.

We've mellowed since 2019's "In Court, Facebook Blames Users for Destroying Their Own Right to Privacy"

Don't regulate FB
Dismember it
Then disembowel it.
Then kill it....

...The intro is a variation on old-school European torture-execution, "Hanged, drawn, and quartered."
I used to get nightmares reading medieval history. 

"...Chinese leaders’ slow shift toward boosting consumption"

Following on November 17's "China stimulus boosts domestic consumption as Trump tariffs loom".

From TriviumChina, November 15:

I’m starting to sense that a major macro-policy shift is underway in Beijing – but, as with all such adjustments, it will take a while to fully play out.

At least, that’s my take after having had a few days to digest the latest fiscal support package announced by the legislature (NPCSC) on Friday.

The shift: Central officials seem to be inching toward the realization that, to directly boost consumption, households need significant, ongoing fiscal support – not just in the near term but for years to come.

Yes, I know all the arguments that Chinese officials have been promising, for decades, to do more to support consumption and rebalance the economy away from investment and exports, with little to show for it.

But we are now operating under new economic and policy conditions.

  • The former dictates that officials must take a fresh approach, while the latter is slowly unlocking the political will to do so.

But before I get into my thinking on this shift, it’s worth taking quick stock of the fiscal announcements the NPCSC and the finance ministry (MoF) made late last week.

The headline: The NPCSC approved RMB 10 trillion of new debt-raising capacity for local governments, to swap off-balance-sheet “hidden debt” for longer-dated, lower-cost, and on-balance-sheet bond issuance.

  • The money will be allocated in two tranches – RMB 6 trillion raised over three years and RMB 4 trillion raised over five years.
  • So that’s RMB 2.8 trillion per year from 2024 to 2026, and RMB 800 billion per year in 2027-2028.
  • So far, we see no difference between the two tranches – as they are both allocated for local government debt swaps – so it’s unclear at this point why authorities broke them out.

Our take: While we got the headline number we wanted, we’re disappointed with the package overall.

  • Our primary disappointment is that the funds are not being raised by the central government and transferred to the localities.
  • It’s increasingly clear – both to us and seemingly to Beijing – that at some point the central government will have to undertake a local government bailout. But it seems officials aren’t ready for that yet.
  • Our second disappointment is that there were not additional funds allocated for outright stimulus measures – whether for the property market, new infrastructure investment, or boosting short-term consumption.
  • So we’d characterize this more as a local government debt relief package than true economic stimulus, per se.

At this point, it is clear that senior officials remain focused, first and foremost, on financial stability – and the vulnerabilities stemming from local governments’ inability to service their debt.

  • The latest fiscal support package is primarily designed to target those most pressing vulnerabilities.

But rest assured, more direct stimulus is in the works – though it won’t be rolled out until 2025.

On the heels of the NPCSC’s debt swap announcement, Finance Minister Lan Fo’an held a press conference to reveal that more support is coming next year, including:...

....MUCH MORE

"World Bank fears budget cuts from Trump White House after losing track of $24B: ‘Running around like headless chickens’"

Ummm, they're a bank. Bank's don't lose track of $24 billion. The Pentagon, sure. But not a bank.

From The New York Post, November 15: 

World Bank officials — under fire for losing track of $24 billion in climate funds — are panicking over the prospect of severe budget cuts as President-elect Donald Trump pledges to slash US government spending, The Post has learned.

According to sources, top brass at the Washington-based lender — which has faced accusations that it’s operated like a slush fund for jet-setting bureaucrats despite a mandate to fight poverty and climate change — have been on edge since Trump’s blowout election victory.

This week, it emerged that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are slated to lead a White House advisory body called the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE — and they could have the World Bank in their sights, according to sources.

“They have been running around like headless chickens since Trump won,” one permanent staffer speaking on condition of anonymity, told The Post.

“It has sparked fear,” the source added. “They will be desperately trying to show they are saving money.”

Trump named the Tesla titan and his one-time Republican presidential challenger to head DOGE on Tuesday. Ramaswamy said he and Musk will “bring a chainsaw” to pare back feckless spending.

“The government shouldn’t be in the business of giving away free money. Uncle Sam isn’t supposed to be ‘Uncle Sucker,” the 39-year-old tech entrepreneur wrote on X.

A source close to the GOP firebrand told The Post that all foreign aid spending is “in scope” for possible cuts.

One area ripe for the knife has been the World Bank’s lavish spending on air travel, fueled by a policy that allows unelected bureaucrats to upgrade to business class for any flight that’s five hours or longer.

Leaked documents obtained by The Post show how managers blew nearly $9,000 on a return business class ticket with a private suite from Washington Dulles airport to Baku in Azerbaijan on the uber-luxurious Qatar Airways....

....MUCH MORE

Also at The Post:

Bill Ackman lists NYC apartments at multimillion-dollar loss: report

Six Carolina Monkeys Continue To Breathe The Sweet Air Of Freedom, Now Joined By Two Emus

Since this piece was written two more of the monkeys have been recaptured.

From The Independent, November 15:

It’s a jungle out there! Multiple emus on the loose in South Carolina – while 8 escaped lab monkeys also still large

There was animal mayhem in South Carolina as two emus went on the loose – while eight escaped monkeys were already at large.

Reports of two large emus running riot in the city of Loris, in Horry County, SC, followed an incident last week when 43 monkeys escaped an Alpha Genesis facility in Beaufort County, SC, the Yemassee Police Department said.

The birds’ owner, Sam Morace, took to social media to plead with locals for their patience, saying: “For everyone that keeps seeing an emu, yes it is mine. There are 2 of them out.”

Morace said his two flightless birds broke loose three months ago and local law enforcement officials were reportedly trying to tranquilize them in order to return them home.

“They are feral and not trained like the ones we have at the house. Thank you for all the concerns and questions. But if the emus were that easy to catch they would be home already”, he shared on Facebook....

....MUCH MORE

I've seen some legal eagles practitioners positing that the monkeys may have a legal claim to that freedom once it is achieved:

...."When a domesticated animal wanders off your property, there’s not a lot of debate that you still own the animal," Marceau said. "When it’s an animal that was once wild and is going back into an area where they could possibly integrate into another wild population, that is a stronger case." 

There is no known wild population of rhesus monkeys in South Carolina, but, Marceau noted, there is a monkey island.....

Related:
Meanwhile In South Carolina: "43 monkeys escape from a South Carolina medical lab. Police say there is no serious danger"
The authorities did however ask residents to lock their doors and windows....

Probably not related:
"How scientists taught monkeys the concept of money. Not long after, the first prostitute monkey appeared"

"Wall Street's Elites Are Piling Into a Massive AI Gamble"

From Bloomberg November 17/18:

Finance’s biggest names are ready to gatecrash the artificial-intelligence party. 

At a dinner hosted by some of Morgan Stanley’s top bankers in New York last month, one topic dominated the table talk: the fortunes to be made from the frenzy around artificial intelligence.

In the room were many of the marquee names of private capital. Apollo Global Management Inc., Ares Management Corp., Blackstone Inc., HPS Investment Partners, KKR & Co. and Oaktree Capital were all invited, the very same firms who’ve recently emerged as a serious threat to Wall Street banks’ long reign over the lucrative world of corporate finance.

But on the night in question Morgan Stanley was preaching unity, according to people who attended. So massive is the demand for investment dollars to build the scaffolding for the latest digital revolution, it argued, that there’s no need to compete over who gets to do the lending. Bankers and private financiers should instead be ready to combine their forces — and their firepower.

While much of the speculative hype around AI has played out in the stock market so far, as seen in chipmaker Nvidia Corp.’s share price, the giddiness is spreading to the sober suits of debt finance and private equity.

Analysis by Bloomberg News estimates at least $1 trillion of spending is needed for the data centers, electricity supplies and communications networks that will power the attempt to deliver on AI’s promise to transform everything from medicine to customer service. Others reckon the total cost could be double that.

Even Wall Street skeptics on AI’s ultimate money-making potential, such as Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s head of equity research Jim Covello, have said it’s worth staying invested in those who provide the plumbing. The wealth of Silicon Valley’s and Seattle’s tech giants, who want some of this capacity anyway for cloud storage and the like, offers a degree of comfort.

Banks are racing to keep up with the burst of activity. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has set up a dedicated infrastructure team to corral its troops, according to a person with knowledge of the matter, as has Deutsche Bank AG and others. One rival banker admits his firm is juggling so many data-center deals that it doesn’t have enough staff to cope with the workload.

It’s the same for debt funding. At its dinner, Morgan Stanley said banks don’t have the balance-sheet heft to satisfy the thirst for credit, hence its pitch to partner up with private capital: There’s room at this feast for everyone.

For investment bankers, the opportunity arrives just as many were hunting their next meal ticket. Providing debt financing to companies has long been a crucial Wall Street profit engine, but the business has been through a rough patch of late. While public equity markets have been going gangbusters over the past couple of years, supercharged by AI mania, returns on investment-grade credit have been anemic. Leveraged-finance teams, who fund riskier private equity buyouts, have suffered as M&A dried up.

“The view is very bullish,” says Dominik Thumfart, Deutsche Bank’s head of EMEA infrastructure and energy origination. “This market will remain a major growth area on the financing side for several years to come. The investing curve is very upward looking.” The German lender has worked on $17 billion of data-center financings over three years.

It’s not just the funding of mammoth new data centers coming to the rescue. Two of corporate finance’s dustiest corners have been shaken into life by the tech industry’s hunger for processing power: Utilities and telecommunications are suddenly among the hottest credit markets around.

For private-market behemoths like Apollo and KKR, digital infrastructure is also a chance to turn the page on a tough period when higher interest rates upended the economics of deals struck in the cheap-money era. Firms including Blackstone, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and Stonepeak Partners have been gobbling up data centers and laying the groundwork to build them, too.

BlackRock Inc.’s boss Larry Fink told Bloomberg TV his firm will raise as much as $120 billion in debt linked to data centers, after teaming up with Microsoft Corp. to bankroll the development of the buildings and energy infrastructure. Bankers and private lenders will be desperate for a slice of such deals.

Nonetheless, even amid the AI delirium there are notes of caution. Some point out that while private equity firms have a solid pedigree in real estate, they haven’t done construction work at the epic scale and expense of some of these data centers — known as “AI factories” in the lingo of Nvidia’s founder and chief executive officer, Jensen Huang. Innovation is constantly upending technology, adding jeopardy to long-term capital projects.

And AI’s acolytes still haven’t dreamed up a “killer app” to match the wildly successful e-commerce and GPS location-based upstarts of the Web 2.0 era. Even if they do, the tech industry’s brightest minds are working to make the software and hardware more efficient, to lessen the need for scale and power.

“There’s a lot of a reason for optimism,” says Barclays Plc’s Benjamin Fernandez, head of the bank’s esoterics ABS business, which works on bonds backed by “non-traditional” assets such as data centers. “But if for whatever reason it doesn’t take hold and people don’t find a way to monetize this investment in AI, that could potentially pose risk.”

Hyperactive
In a nod to the sheer size of their ambitions to manage, process and manipulate ever vaster magnitudes of data — and to the mountains of cash on their books — tech companies including Amazon.Com Inc., Microsoft, Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Meta Platforms and Apple Inc. have become known as “hyperscalers.” Their spending matches the grandiose language.

Hyperscalers lavished $52.9 billion on AI infrastructure in just three months, Craig Scroggie, CEO of Australian data-center group NEXTDC Ltd, said in October.

Further proof of the “unsatiable demand” for computing horsepower, according to real-estate broker Jones Lang LaSalle Inc., is the more than sevenfold increase over two years in construction work on US co-location centers, which lease out rack space to tech firms. Asking rents in those facilities have jumped as much as 37% in 12 months, the firm estimated in an August report.

All of this unbridled spending is revving up the issuance of both investment-grade debt and riskier leveraged loans, especially in the US, handily for private lenders and fee-starved investment bankers alike. Hedge funds are looking as well to profit from AI hysteria with novel types of debt structures.

It’s also opened up a new corner of the asset-backed securities market, where sales of debt backed by data centers have already jumped to a near-record $7.1 billion this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg News. Chuck in fiber networks and other bits of kit, and it’ll be much higher. Matt Bissonette, who heads Guggenheim Securities’ business in this area, says the number of buyers for his data-center ABS products has roughly doubled in four years....

....MUCH MORE

Norwegians Fishing For Halibut Catch A U.S. Nuclear Submarine

Apparently it's catch-and-release, no taking it home to show the kids.

From the Barents Observer, November 15:

Norwegian fishermen snagged U.S. nuclear-powered submarine
The young men were sailing for halibut, but instead got a cruise-missile attack submarine.

“We had just emptied the nets and put them out again, and was on our way back to shore at Sommarøya when we were called by the Coast Guard on channel 16 on the VHF-radio,” says Harald Engen (22) to NRK Troms. Engen is captain on Øygutt, the 10 meters small fishing vessel.

The Coast Guard could inform that a submarine had sailed into the net and dragged it two nautical miles north were it was cut off.

The net is lost deep down, but the fishermen in their early 20s now have a good story to tell at the local pub. 

“I know about other vessels that have sailed over fishing nets, but no-one out here have ever heard about a submarine doing so,” says Engen.

The incident occurred outside Malangen, west of Tromsø on the coast to the Norwegian Sea....

....MUCH MORE

Brain Gain: A Person Can Instantly Blossom into a Savant—and No One Knows Why

So you're saying there's still hope?

From Scientific American:

Some people suddenly become accomplished artists or musicians with no previous interest or training. Is it possible innate genius lies dormant within everyone?

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Savant syndrome comes in different forms. In congenital savant syndrome

the extraordinary savant ability surfaces in early childhood. In acquired savant syndrome astonishing new abilities, typically in music, art or mathematics, appear unexpectedly in ordinary persons after a head injury, stroke or other central nervous system (CNS) incident where no such abilities or interests were present pre-incident.

But in sudden savant syndrome an ordinary person with no such prior interest or ability and no precipitating injury or other CNS incident has an unanticipated, spontaneous epiphanylike moment where the rules and intricacies of music, art or mathematics, for example, are experienced and revealed, producing almost instantaneous giftedness and ability in the affected area of skill sets. Because there is no underlying disability such as that which occurs in congenital or acquired savant syndromes, technically sudden savant syndrome would be better termed sudden genius....

....MUCH MORE

As the man said when referred to as an idiot savant:

"Who you callin' a savant?"

Following The American ATACMS Decision The Russian Whackadoodles Are Coming Out In Force: "....A demonstration nuclear explosion off the coast of Great Britain and France"

As noted yesterday, "The Decision To Allow U.S.-Made Munitions To Bomb Russia Sure Got Moscow's Attention". The article we linked was one of the saner examples. Here's another one, via Pravda.com (there's also Pravda.ru, it gets complicated):

The expert suggested a possible answer to the permission to strike deep into Russia

The expert suggested a possible answer to the permission to strike deep into Russia

MOSCOW, Nov 18 - RIA Novosti. Russia should consider the possibility of launching a demonstration single nuclear strike in the waters near the coast of Great Britain and France after allowing Kiev to strike long-range missiles at the territory of the Russian Federation, Igor Korotchenko, editor-in-chief of the National Defense magazine, told RIA Novosti.

Earlier, the New York Times newspaper, citing unnamed representatives of the American administration, reported that US President Joe Biden for the first time authorized the use of American long-range missiles by Ukraine for strikes on Russian territory. According to the New York Times, Biden's move is related to information about the alleged presence of North Korean forces in the Kursk region. Later, Figaro reported that France and the United Kingdom also allowed Ukraine to strike at the territory of the Russian Federation using their long-range weapons.

"If, in addition to the White House's permission for Ukraine to use ATACMS missiles for attacks deep into Russian territory, Biden also agreed on similar actions by the United Kingdom and France to use the transferred British and French Storm Shadow and SCALP-EG cruise missiles, this already makes the situation explosive," Korotchenko said.

According to him, in this case, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be able to launch massive strikes with cruise missiles of British, French and American production on the territory of the Russian Federation.

"In this situation, the question may arise about a demonstration nuclear strike in the marine area near the coast of Great Britain and France in order to demonstrate Russia's determination in case of failure to take measures to curb such actions by the Armed Forces of Ukraine," Korotchenko said.

Russia has previously drawn attention to the fact that the United States has no evidence that military personnel from the DPRK are allegedly present at its base. And North Korea called accusations against Pyongyang of sending military personnel to Russia "dirty maneuvers" by the United States and its allies to mask their own crimes and prolong the conflict in Ukraine.

Russian President Vladimir Putin previously stated that NATO countries are now discussing not just the possible use of Western long-range weapons by Kiev, in fact they are deciding whether to get directly involved in the Ukrainian conflict. The direct participation of Western countries in the Ukrainian conflict will change its essence, Russia will be forced to make decisions based on the threats thus created for it, he added. Dmitry Peskov, the press secretary of the Russian leader, noted that the president's statement on the consequences of Western weapons strikes deep into Russia was extremely clear and unambiguous, there is no doubt that it reached the addressees.