Taking energy as an example, the rule-of-thumb the old-time traders used was 10:1 i.e. a twenty percent increase in the price of oil flowed through the economy to result in a 2% rise in the general price level.
Because the economy is so much less energy-intensive than it was when those old boys were counting on their thumbs the ratio is probably 20:1, maybe even 25:1 but it still adds up. the recent 30% or so increase in the price of oil, unless it is quickly reversed, means a 1% - 1.5% increase in CPI.
And then you have wage increases. I'm all for private-sector unions asking for as much as they think they can get, It was Samuel Gompers, labor leader extraordinaire, who rhetorically asked what labor wanted and answered "More"* but the math is the math and if the United Auto Workers get the 46% wage increase they are asking for it will raise prices.
Throw in a dozen other examples and that's my rationale for bastardizing Santayana with his "Only the dead have seen the end of war" observation: Only the dead have seen the end of inflation.
Via ZeroHedge, September 4:
....TS Lombard noted that unless employment breaks soon, inflation will likely reaccelerate. This would be due to corporate profits turning a corner after a slight slowdown.
The report's key points are:
- Surprise upturn in Q2 nonfinancial profits (taxes fell) stabilizes wages and hiring.
- One quarter is not a trend, and Q3 sees raised capital costs for firms.
- Employment trends, mixed for now, have added importance – if they do not bend soon, it means profits are improving and more hikes are coming.