I am unsure about both the veracity and the spin on this story but it fits with some previous observations, links below.
From The Guardian, November 29:
At a time when distrust of big tech is high, Silicon Valley is embracing an alternative ecosystem where every CEO is a star
A
montage of Palantir’s CEO, Alex Karp, and waving US flags set to a
remix of AC/DC’s Thunderstruck blasts out as the intro for the tech
billionaire’s interview with Sourcery, a YouTube show presented by the
digital finance platform Brex. Over the course of a friendly walk
through the company offices, Karp fields no questions about Palantir’s controversial ties to ICE
but instead extolls the company’s virtues, brandishes a sword and
discusses how he exhumed the remains of his childhood dog Rosita to
rebury them near his current home.
“That’s really sweet,” host Molly O’Shea tells Karp.
If
you are looking to hear from some of tech’s most powerful people, you
will increasingly find them on a constellation of shows and podcasts
like Sourcery that provide a safe space for an industry that is wary, if
not openly hostile, towards critical media outlets. Some of the new
media outlets are created by the companies themselves. Others just
occupy a specific niche that has found a friendly ear among the tech
billionaire class like a remora on a fast-moving shark. The heads of
tech’s largest companies, including Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Sam
Altman, Satya Nadella and more, have all sat for long, cozy interviews
in recent months, while firms like Palantir and Andreessen Horowitz have branched out this year into creating their own media ventures.
At a time when the majority of Americans distrust big tech and believe artificial intelligence will harm society,
Silicon Valley has built its own network of alternative media where
CEOs, founders and investors are the unchallenged and beloved stars.
What was once the province of a few fawning podcasters has grown into a
fully fledged ecosystem of publications and shows supported by some of
the tech industry’s most powerful.
While
pro-tech influencers like podcast host Lex Fridman have for years formed
a symbiotic relationship with tech elites like Elon Musk, some firms
have decided this year to cut out the middleman entirely. In September,
the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz announced that it had
launched an a16z blog on Substack. One of its prominent writers,
investor Katherine Boyle, has a longstanding friendship
with JD Vance. Its podcast has meanwhile grown to more than 220,000
subscribers on YouTube, and last month hosted OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman,
who counts Andreessen Horowitz as a major investor.
“What
if the future of media isn’t controlled by algorithms or legacy
institutions, but by independent voices building directly with their
audiences?” the firm wrote in its Substack announcement. The firm once
invested $50m in the digital media upstart BuzzFeed with a similar
vision, only to see it fall into penny stock territory.
The
a16z Substack also announced this month that the firm was launching an
eight-week new media fellowship for “operators, creators, and
storytellers shaping the future of media”. The fellowship includes
collaborating with a16z’s new media operation, which it describes as
being made up of “online legends” creating a “single place where
founders acquire the legitimacy, taste, brandbuilding, expertise, and
momentum they need to win the narrative battle online”.
In
addition to a16z’s media effort, Palantir launched a digital and print
publication earlier this year called the Republic that mimics academic
journals and thinktank-style magazines like Foreign Affairs. The journal
is funded by the Palantir Foundation for Defense Policy and
International Affairs, a non-profit of which Karp is the chair, though
he only works there 0.01 hours per week, according to 2023 tax filings.
“Far
too many people who should not have a platform do. And there are far
too many people who should have a platform but do not,” states the
Republic, which has an editorial team made up of senior Palantir
executives.
A sampling of the articles the
Republic has published includes an essay arguing that US copyright law
restrictions will prevent US AI dominance and another from two Palantir
employees on how Silicon Valley working with the military is good for
society, a point Karp has himself made many times.
The
Republic joins a burgeoning set of pro-tech publications like Arena
magazine, which was founded late last year by the Austin-based venture
capitalist Max Meyer. The outlet takes its motto, “The New Needs
Friends”, from Disney’s film Ratatouille.
“At
Arena, we don’t cover ‘the news.’ We cover The New,” a letter from the
editors stated in its inaugural issue. “Our mission at Arena is to cheer
on the people who are, slowly but surely – and sometimes very quickly! –
bringing the future into the present.”....
....MUCH MORE
...Following on the three stories immediately below:
here is the first of three flashbacks, this one originally linked in January 2021.
And: Andreessen
Horowitz and the Media: Yikes! (COIN) "Inside the nasty battle between
Silicon Valley and the reporters who write about it."
Here Mr. A. is enabled by the media:
Nov. 2016
Marc Andreessen Speaks: "Flying cars are closer than you think"
And speaks, and speaks...
You know how he is....
May, 2015
Marc Andreessen In the New Yorker:
13,000+ words.
Oct. 2014
New York Magazine's Million Word Interview With Mark Andreessen
It's not really a million words but man-o-mandingo the guy likes to talk.
And Nov. 2022: With Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes In The News, Here's A Piece Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen Wrote For The New York Times
Turning the microscope the other way:
FTX/Bankman-Fried: When Outlets As Disparate As The Spectator and Vanity Fair Call For A Media Reckoning You Know Something's Up
Here's Tablet Magazine's description of Bankman-Fried's direct efforts to influence media:
.....Over the past two years, Bankman-Fried cultivated the media lavishly, if
not carefully. Drawing on what then seemed like an unlimited pool of
cash, SBF (as we’ll call the mythologized version of the real person)
dispersed investments, advertising dollars, sponsorships, and donations
to key news outlets—including ProPublica, Vox, Semafor, and The
Intercept—with extraordinary effectiveness.....
Finally, from March 2023:
"A fake news frenzy: why ChatGPT could be disastrous for truth in journalism"
The Guardian is concerned about Truth In Journalism.
*****
....The most worrying fact to be reiterated is that ChatGPT has no
commitment to the truth. As the MIT Technology Review puts it, large
language model chatbots are “notorious bullshitters”. Disinformation,
grifting and criminality don’t generally require a commitment to truth
either. Visit the forums of blackhatworld.com, where those involved in
murky practices trade ideas for making money out of fake content, and
ChatGPT is heralded as a gamechanger for generating better fake reviews,
or comments, or convincing profiles....
*****
It was at this point I started laughing.
That line "...has no
commitment to the truth." followed by “notorious bullshitters” reminded
me of a story in the Guardian in 2018.
They employ someone called
Luke Harding who [co-]wrote a story that ran in the paper on Tue 27 Nov
2018 09.23 EST. Going on five years ago:
Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian embassy, sources say
Trump ally met WikiLeaks founder months before emails hacked by Russia were published
Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort held secret talks
with Julian Assange inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and visited
around the time he joined Trump’s campaign, the Guardian has been told.
Sources have said Manafort went to see Assange in 2013, 2015 and in
spring 2016 – during the period when he was made a key figure in Trump’s
push for the White House.
In a statement, Manafort denied meeting Assange. He said: “I have never
met Julian Assange or anyone connected to him. I have never been
contacted by anyone connected to WikiLeaks, either directly or
indirectly. I have never reached out to Assange or WikiLeaks on any
matter.”
It is unclear why Manafort would have wanted to see Assange and what was
discussed. But the last apparent meeting is likely to come under
scrutiny and could interest Robert Mueller, the special prosecutor who
is investigating alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and
Russia....
....MUCH MORE
The
thing to remember, for our readers who were going on about their lives
rather than trying to figure-out a money-making angle in that day's
headlines, was that what Harding, his editors and the Guardian claimed
was impossible.
At the time the story was published the Ecuadoran
Embassy in London was the most surveilled building in the world. The
British had it staked out, both MI5 and MI6 were keeping tabs on who was
coming and going, the Australians were down the block, the Americans
had a plan for a CIA assassination team to supplant the watchers [Yahoo broke that story],
Russia was there, I'm guessing Israel and maybe China too. The spooks
were tripping over each other there were so many different groups.
And none of them saw what Harding reported.
The
Ecuadorans didn't detect Manafort entering their embassy, no reports of
sounds emanating from the sewers as a rather chonky Manafort made his
subterranean way in, there were no articles about parachute
drops/vertical insertions reported by the dozen or so media types that
would come round to see if they could rustle up a story—though we did
see this scoop from American public radio:
There were police on the scene, quite a few actually. In 2015 the Telegraph reported: