The Bloomberg headline makes it sound as though they're reporting on the 100 Years War.
Two from Bloomberg via the shipping mavens at gCaptain,
First up, September 6, the headliner:
Iran said it targeted three oil tankers using an unauthorized route through the Strait of Hormuz, as well as a number of US-linked ships, in retaliation for American attacks on Iranian tankers over the weekend.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy gave no further details about the incidents, nor did its Telegram post late Saturday specify whether the vessels were hit. The IRGC later said it also attacked a US naval drone and an American military unmanned surface vessel attempting to enter the strait....
....MUCH MORE
And September 5:
U.S. Destroys Iranian Tanker, Disables Two Others After Missile Attacks on Navy Warships
U.S. forces struck three Iranian oil tankers on Saturday after Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps launched ballistic missiles at two U.S. Navy warships, marking another sharp escalation in the maritime conflict between Washington and Tehran.
U.S. Central Command said the Iranian missiles targeted an American aircraft carrier and guided-missile destroyer operating in regional waters. Both warships successfully evaded multiple attacks and no U.S. personnel were injured, according to CENTCOM.
The U.S. response targeted three crude oil tankers that CENTCOM described as part of a multibillion-dollar shadow network used to finance the IRGC and its regional proxies....
....MUCH MORE
This post on why there has been no resolution seems to be aging well:
So A Sea Captain And A Cambridge Don Came To The Same Realization: "The Hormuz Hypothesis"
