From the New York Times, April 28:
For better or worse, artificial intelligence is driving a major upheaval in American politics that will alter the substance and the character of campaigns.
A.I. has emerged as a powerful political tool with the potential either to improve the quality of decision-making on Election Day or to do the opposite and subvert the process of deliberation.
Perhaps surprisingly, a number of studies have shown that A.I. chatbots and large language models have stronger persuasive powers than humans.
In “When Large Language Models Are More Persuasive Than Incentivized Humans, and Why,” which was published last May, an international team of 40 researchers wrote:
In our first large-scale experiment, humans vs. L.L.M.s (Claude 3.5 Sonnet) interacted with other humans who were completing an online quiz for a reward, attempting to persuade them toward a given (either correct or incorrect) answer.
Claude was more persuasive than incentivized human persuaders both in truthful and deceptive contexts and it significantly increased accuracy if persuasion was truthful, but decreased it if persuasion was deceptive.
The authors suggested “that these effects may be due to L.L.M.s expressing higher conviction than humans.”
In a separate paper, “Persuading Voters Using Human-Artificial Intelligence Dialogues,” which was published in December, eight researchers studied the persuasive effectiveness of A.I. models through “conversations” with human participants about political candidates. They found “significant and positive treatment effects on candidate preference that are larger than typically observed from traditional video advertisements.”
One of the authors, Adam Berinsky, a political scientist at M.I.T., responded by email to my inquiries:
In preregistered experiments across the 2024 U.S. election, the 2025 Canadian election, the 2025 Polish election and a 2024 Massachusetts ballot measure on psychedelics, dialogues with frontier L.L.M.s meaningfully shifted voter preferences.
The effects ran larger than what we typically see from traditional video ads — roughly three to four points on candidate preference in the U.S., about 10 points in Canada and Poland, and 14 to 22 points on the Massachusetts measure.
Berinsky, however, pointedly put the study’s conclusions in a more cautious context:
Anxiety about A.I. in politics is often anxiety about persuasion itself, displaced onto a new technology. We went through versions of this with television, direct mail, cable news, social media and microtargeting. Each time, the predicted revolution arrived smaller than advertised, because voters are harder to move than observers assume.
Our results show A.I. can shift attitudes more than traditional ads in a controlled conversational setting, which is new. But the jump from “A.I. moves voters in a lab” to “A.I. decides the next election” still has to clear the delivery problem — and nobody has.
I asked two practitioners of the dark arts of politics for their assessment of the influence of A.I. They are not happy campers.
Joe Trippi, who managed Howard Dean’s 2004 presidential campaign and Doug Jones’s successful 2017 bid for an Alabama Senate seat, among others, replied by email to my queries:
As someone who pioneered the use of technology and the internet in politics it’s clear to me that A.I. will be used to manipulate and influence voters and citizens to stoke political division and further erode community and our democracy.
We have placed a Trojan horse (the cellphone) in the palm of everyone’s hand that provides direct access to the minds of millions addicted to bot- and algorithmic- and now A.I.-driven information flow that consultants in both parties, campaigns and foreign actors will use to manipulate and divide in the ends-justify-the-means political culture.
Artificial intelligence, Trippi wrote,
is already invading everything from opposition research to digital ad production in ways that will accelerate and amplify the most powerful negative attacks and pinpoint the delivery of those attacks to voters most susceptible to the argument.
No campaign or party will pass on the power of A.I. to manipulate. Trust, the key to democracy and community and already eroded by social media, bots and algorithms, will now contend with A.I. manipulation of what is even real.
Trippi was unrelenting: “We have empowered a handful to become fabulously wealthy billionaires who build platforms and tools to keep us addicted to hours of doomscrolling through bots, deepfakes and algorithmic-driven choices.”....
....MUCH MORE
It sounds as if Mr. Trippi is concerned that AI will do what he attempts to do.
But better, faster, cheaper, backwards and in heels.
